From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 01:02:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 01:02:18 -0400 Received: from con-64-133-52-190-ria.sprinthome.com ([64.133.52.190]:13074 "EHLO ziggy.one-eyed-alien.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 01:02:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 22:01:18 -0700 From: Matthew Dharm To: Tom Rini Cc: Val Henson , jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, becker@scyld.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Endian-ness bugs in yellowfin.c Message-ID: <20010913220118.A647@one-eyed-alien.net> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Rini , Val Henson , jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, becker@scyld.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20010913195141.B799@boardwalk> <20010913193937.O21906@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <20010913205459.A1169@boardwalk> <20010913200237.P21906@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010913200237.P21906@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net>; from trini@kernel.crashing.org on Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:02:37PM -0700 Organization: One Eyed Alien Networks X-Copyright: (C) 2001 Matthew Dharm, all rights reserved. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would agree that listing them under the highest capable is probably the best. It is, at least, consistent with the 10/100 cards. Also, people will pick up the card, think "gigabit ethernet", and then look under the 1000 section. I don't think anyone will really think GigE and then look under 10/100. The Intel 82543 and 82544 gigabit parts are all 10/100/1000 -- I'll be writing a driver for those in a few weeks if nobody beats me to it, so I think it would be good to settle this. Matt On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:02:37PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:55:01PM -0600, Val Henson wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:39:37PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:51:41PM -0600, Val Henson wrote: > > > > - tristate ' Symbios 53c885 (Synergy ethernet) support' CONFI= G_NCR885E > > > > + tristate ' Symbios 53c885 (Synergy ethernet) support' CONFI= G_YELLOWFIN > > >=20 > > > Since you're killing this, why not just remove this question entirely? > >=20 > > This is one of the "design decisions" I referred to. It makes no > > sense to list a 100 Mbit driver under "Ethernet (1000 Mbit)". This is > > my solution. This is the first case of a dual 1000/100 Mbit driver > > and if there's a better way to handle it I'd like to hear it. >=20 > Er, sungem does 10/100/1000 too I think.. (It's what's in the new G4 > towers..). IMHO, listing it once under the greatest makes sense. But > sungem/gmac are under 10/100 I think. >=20 > --=20 > Tom Rini (TR1265) > http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ --=20 Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.= net=20 Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver C: They kicked your ass, didn't they? S: They were cheating! -- The Chief and Stef User Friendly, 11/19/1997 --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7oY8ez64nssGU+ykRAgldAKCLWmSCNgVI0s65WNGYFakagBACPwCcD9xE viBYvDcNim9m7pYg2R4qCuA= =qXo0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--