From: jurij@euroseek.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: VIA IDE and SMP do not work together (2.2.19 ide patch)
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 20:17:05 +0200 (MET DST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200109141817.UAA00924@w2.euroseek.net> (raw)
Hi!
Recently we've been trying to install linux on a machine with
Tyan S2507 Tiger 230 2-processor motherboard with a VIA Apollo
Pro 133A chipset (particularly, VIA IDE controller VT82C686B).
We have tried 2.2.19 kernel with ide patch dated 05042001 from
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/ide-2.2.19/
It turns out, that when both the support for VIA82CXXXX chipset
and SMP are enabled, the machine refuses to boot, it hangs right
after the lines
hda: IC35L060AVER07-0, ATA DISK drive
hdb: SAMSUNG CD-ROM SC-152C, ATAPI CDROM drive
hdc: IC35L060AVER07-0, ATA DISK drive
(I am not quite sure, which line is actually the last, but I could
check that if needed)
However, if one disables either SMP or VIA82CXXXX chipset support
(keeping "Generic PCI IDE chipset support", "Generic PCI bus-master
DMA support" and "Use DMA by default when available"), then the
machine boots ok. In the latter case one still can achieve full
disk performance by issuing "hdparm -c1d1X69 /dev/hda", after that
"hdparm -t" reports around 32-33 MB/sec, however a message like
"ide0: Speed warnings UDMA 3/4/5 is not functional." appears in the
logs. Full dmesg from such a boot is available at
http://www.theophys.kth.se/~jurijus/dmesg
Another strange feature is a message
"WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail to linux-smp@vger.kernel.org"
Thus, few questions arise:
1. Should one try some other version of kernel/patch/whatever to make
VIA82CXXXX and SMP work together?
2. Is it worth it? What's the advantage of using VIA82CXXXX chipset
support? It seems like we are getting maximum disk performance even
without it, just with "Generic PCI IDE chipset support" provided by
the patch.
3. What's that "Speed warnings" message from hdparm?
4. Should one worry about the "unexpected IO-APIC"? It does not seem to
affect the SMP functionality, what does it actually mean?
Best regards and TIA,
Jurij.
P.S. Please CC the responses to me, because I'm not subscribed.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Free Email at http://mail.euroseek.com
next reply other threads:[~2001-09-14 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-14 18:17 jurij [this message]
2001-09-14 23:19 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200109141817.UAA00924@w2.euroseek.net \
--to=jurij@euroseek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®