From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 04:14:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 04:14:15 -0400 Received: from krusty.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:26116 "HELO krusty.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 04:14:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:14:28 +0200 From: Matthias Andree To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.9-ac11 Message-ID: <20010917101428.E7717@emma1.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200109170049.f8H0nkEa008317@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl> <20010917095640.C4490@werewolf.able.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010917095640.C4490@werewolf.able.es> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, J . A . Magallon wrote: > > On 20010917 Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > >That particular code is only called if something closes a file on > >which POSIX locks are applied. Init doesn't use locking. > >The patch *is* required in Alan's tree. Without it, 2 processes that > ^^^^^^^^ ??? > >lock the same file can race and corrupt the i_flock list. > > > > I have checked and I suppose you want to say that it is INCLUDED in > Alan's tree... Translation to clear text: it must not be dropped from Alan's tree.