From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:49:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:48:49 -0400 Received: from tomts16.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.4]:40634 "EHLO tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:48:39 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Ed Tomlinson Organization: me To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: the Gimp and pre11 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:44:11 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20010919034412.092EB9CF9@oscar.casa.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Is it just me or is the Gimp visibily slower with pre11 compared to pre10? I am editing 6 Megapixel files (2800x2048) and things like rotations seem to have delays that were not happening with previous kernels. My box has 320M. Seems that pre11 does not swap out as much as pre10 so Gimp has less to work with. Ed Tomlinson