mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: austin@coremetrics.com (Gonyou, Austin),
	narancs@narancs.tii.matav.hu, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFS to main kernel source
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 15:16:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200109202016.f8KKGrL19642@jen.americas.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>  of "Thu, 20 Sep 2001 21:14:47 BST." <E15kADf-000632-00@the-village.bc.nu>

> > Won't there be a lot of changes which need to be made for it to go into 2.5
> > anyway though beyond just current development? Isn't 2.5 supposed to be
> > "radically" different?
> 
> Not really. 2.5 will change over time for certain but if anything the 2.5
> changes will make it easier. One problem area with XFS is that it duplicates
> chunks of what should be generic functionality - and 2.5 needs to provide
> the generic paths it wants

Since we have your attention - which chunks? One of the frustrations we have
had is the lack of feedback from anyone who has looked at XFS.

Just interested.

Steve



  reply	other threads:[~2001-09-20 20:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-20 20:07 Gonyou, Austin
2001-09-20 20:14 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-20 20:16   ` Steve Lord [this message]
2001-09-20 20:25     ` Alan Cox
2001-09-20 20:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-09-20 21:31       ` Steve Lord
2001-09-21  3:12         ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-21  3:25           ` Steve Lord
2001-09-21  4:42             ` Nathan Scott
2001-09-21  5:58         ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-09-21  8:40           ` Narancs v1
2001-09-21 14:19         ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-21 14:45           ` Steve Lord
2001-09-20 20:40     ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-21 18:03       ` Steve Lord
2001-09-20 20:29 ` Horst von Brand
2001-09-20 20:50   ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-21 23:32 [PATCH] Remove needless BKL from release functions David C. Hansen
2001-11-22 10:12 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-11-22 12:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-11-22 12:30     ` Horst von Brand
2001-11-22 13:05       ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-11-23  9:44       ` Rick Lindsley
2001-11-23 10:10         ` Oliver.Neukum
2001-11-23 10:47           ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-11-23 11:24             ` Oliver Neukum
2001-11-26 17:46             ` David C. Hansen
2001-11-26 19:41               ` Flavio Stanchina
2001-11-26 19:53                 ` David C. Hansen
2001-11-23 12:08           ` Rick Lindsley
2001-11-06 20:04 [PATCH] lp.c, eexpress.c jiffies cleanup Tim Schmielau
2001-11-06 21:15 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-06 21:37 ` Philip Blundell
2001-11-07  0:10   ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-06 23:58     ` Tim Hockin
2001-09-20 18:12 XFS to main kernel source Narancs v1
2001-09-20 20:02 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200109202016.f8KKGrL19642@jen.americas.sgi.com \
    --to=lord@sgi.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=austin@coremetrics.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=narancs@narancs.tii.matav.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®