From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 12:50:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 12:50:37 -0400 Received: from maile.telia.com ([194.22.190.16]:24265 "EHLO maile.telia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 12:50:25 -0400 Message-Id: <200109231648.f8NGmmK11359@maile.telia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Roger Larsson To: Robert Love Subject: Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 18:43:55 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: safemode , Dieter =?iso-8859-1?q?N=FCtzel?= , george anzinger , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <200109230042.f8N0gw129012@mailf.telia.com> <1001214128.873.26.camel@phantasy> In-Reply-To: <1001214128.873.26.camel@phantasy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 23 September 2001 05.02, Robert Love wrote: > On Sat, 2001-09-22 at 20:38, Roger Larsson wrote: > > Riels schedule in __alloc_pages probably helps the case with competing > > regular processes a lot. Not allowing memory allocators to run their > > whole time slot. The result should be a way to prioritize memory allocs > > relative your priority. (yield part might be possible/good to remove) > > When did this go in? I assume its in the 2.4.9-ac series and not > 2.4.10? 2.4.0-test something... It was removed when introducing Andreas VM /RogerL -- Roger Larsson Skellefteċ Sweden