Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 16:18:29 -0500 From: J Troy Piper To: Andrew Morton Cc: lkml , "ext3-users@redhat.com" Subject: Re: ext3-2.4-0.9.10 Message-ID: <20010924161829.A244@dok.org> In-Reply-To: <3BAECC4F.EF25393@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3BAECC4F.EF25393@zip.com.au>; from akpm@zip.com.au on Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:01:51PM -0700 Return-Path: On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:01:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > An ext3 patch against linux 2.4.10 is at > > http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ > > This patch is *lightly tested* - ie, it boots and does stuff. > The changes to ext3 are small, but the kernel which it patches > has recently changed a lot. If you're cautious, please wait > a couple of days. > > The patch retains the buffer-tracing code. This will soon be > broken out into a separate patch to make ext3 suitable for > submission for the mainstream kernel. > Hey Andrew, Any more progress on my journal_revoke BUG? Strangely enough, I've been mounting the drives as ext2 to try and avoid the errors, but I *STILL* hit the BUG when untar'ing a large file, or compiling a large file (ie. kernel source), which is somewhat unnerving. --- /************************/ /* J. Troy Piper */ /* */ /* Ignotum per Ignotius */ /************************/