From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 05:51:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 05:51:46 -0400 Received: from humbolt.nl.linux.org ([131.211.28.48]:32773 "EHLO humbolt.nl.linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 05:51:36 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: Linux VM design Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:58:54 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: VDA , Andrea Arcangeli , Alexander Viro , In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20010925095154Z16300-2759+186@humbolt.nl.linux.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On September 24, 2001 09:32 pm, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > To tell the truth, I don't really see why the frequency > > information is all that useful either. > > > So the list of reasons why aging is good is looking really short. > > Ummmm, that _you_ can't see it doesn't mean suddenly all > VM research from the last 15 years has been invalidated. Did you have some more reasons to add to the list? -- Daniel