From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:11:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:10:49 -0400 Received: from lambik.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.1]:22279 "EHLO lambik.cc.kuleuven.ac.be") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:10:38 -0400 Message-Id: <200109252211.AAA32046@lambik.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Frank Dekervel To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.10 data corruption ? Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 00:10:57 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org oops ... sorry for the empty mail, and what i wanted to write is: atleast one of the machines is showing hardware troubles. So i think the other one will be an unlucky coincidence ... sorry for the false alert, greetings, frank op dinsdag 25 september 2001 20:22 , schreef Frank Dekervel in <200109251842.UAA25156@lambik.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> : > hello, > > two machines (both athlon) did strange things after i upgraded to 2.4.10 > (started to crash at random, i got errors loading shared libs after > upgrading them and a reinstall of the same .deb's fixed it) > both are athlons, non-overclocked. On one of them i always ran 2.4, the > other is new so it could be a hardware failure ... > > I didn't find (if there is) the actual corruption yet, i'll do md5sums on > the broken and the correct machines tomorrow. > Someone got similar problems ? > > greetings, > Frank > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/