From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 07:19:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 07:19:24 -0400 Received: from krusty.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:57611 "HELO krusty.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 07:19:08 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:19:31 +0200 From: Matthias Andree To: Linux-Kernel mailing list Subject: login vs. portmap revisited Message-ID: <20010926131931.D5832@emma1.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: Linux-Kernel mailing list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I recently dug through the mail archives to figure why my login requires portmap. It seems that poll or recvfrom return semantics have changed from 2.2 to 2.4, and some login or PAM didn't track the change. Does anyone have details on this? Whom do I ask for updates? PAM guys? glibc guys? "login" maintainer? -- Matthias Andree "Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin