From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:31:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:30:56 -0400 Received: from mario.gams.at ([194.42.96.10]:10110 "EHLO mario.gams.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:30:40 -0400 Message-Id: <200109271531.RAA24793@frodo.gams.co.at> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.3 From: Bernd Petrovitsch To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.10 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:23:50 CDT." X-Url: http://www.luga.at/~bernd/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-2121043318P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:31:06 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_-2121043318P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In message , "George R. Kasic= a" wro te: >I'm currently running 2.4.5 here and I'm considering 2.4.10 but am >somewhat more nervous about this release than others based on the >number of reports of problems I'm seeing... > >What would be the advice of others in terms of moving up from 2.4.5 >which has been rock solid here? = > >Would you recommend doing the upgrade or waiting for 2.4.11 or is >there a middle ground release (2.4.6,7,8,9) that you'd recommend. I tried all from 2.4.5 up to 2.4.10 (and also some before) running on sev= eral machines : - an Athlon 900, an AMD K6 300 : no problems (being 2.4.10 = subjectively slightly faster than before) - an Pentium 90 : 2.4.6-2.4.9 just didn't want to boot - no damage. IMHO : Just try it. Bernd -- = Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd@gams.at g.a.m.s gmbh Fax : +43 1 205255-900 Prinz-Eugen-Stra=DFe 8 A-1040 Vienna/Austria/Europe LUGA : http://www.luga.at --==_Exmh_-2121043318P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 iQBVAwUBO7NGOq/rvrblD00BAQIGdgH/STUsT6v3VZMecjuk2vw1YOEqd/QY4FRJ Tth+XWYPnMrruhzonnEofikBad4iQaXNaMe4Ppomn7c6Eaw32agu7w== =OBTq -----END PGP MESSAGE----- --==_Exmh_-2121043318P--