From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 08:49:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 08:48:54 -0400 Received: from hal.grips.com ([62.144.214.40]:28865 "EHLO hal.grips.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 08:48:42 -0400 Message-Id: <200109281248.f8SCmaT29893@hal.grips.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Gerold Jury To: Andrey Nekrasov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BENCH] Problems with IO throughput and fairness with 2.4.10 and 2.4.9-ac15 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:48:36 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] In-Reply-To: <3BB31F99.941813DD@anu.edu.au> <200109280851.f8S8pKL29417@hal.grips.com> <20010928142740.A3678@spylog.ru> In-Reply-To: <20010928142740.A3678@spylog.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thanks, nice to hear. So it needs to be something stupid on my side or xfs with the new VM. By the way. It is an Atlon 1.1 (kernel compiled with Atlon optimisation) IDE controller ATA66, disk IBM 15 GB ATA33 The machine is solid with and without VIA pci bit 7 byte 55 zero/one swapspace 256MB preempable patch does not help with my D state problem i have not tried 2.4.10.aa1 but i will try with ext2 instead of xfs next time Gerold On Friday 28 September 2001 12:27, Andrey Nekrasov wrote: > Hello Gerold Jury, > > > I am run "dbench 32", all test ok. > Kernel 2.4.10-xfs + 2.4.10.aa1 + preempteble patch. > File system on test partition ext2. > > Compiled with no highmem support. > > Hardware configuration: > > Dell Optiplex G1 (P2-350/256RAM/IDE disk 1Gb)