From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S276469AbRI2JEZ>; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 05:04:25 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S276470AbRI2JEP>; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 05:04:15 -0400
Received: from saturn.cs.uml.edu ([129.63.8.2]:14355 "EHLO saturn.cs.uml.edu")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S276469AbRI2JD7>;
	Sat, 29 Sep 2001 05:03:59 -0400
From: "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>
Message-Id: <200109290904.f8T94CK415413@saturn.cs.uml.edu>
Subject: Re: Binary only module overview
To: tegeran@home.com
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 05:04:12 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), arjanv@redhat.com,
        segfault@club-internet.fr (Daniel Caujolle-Bert),
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20010928145243.XVTG10339.femail37.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there> from "Nicholas Knight" at Sep 28, 2001 07:52:48 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Nicholas Knight writes:

> I'd prefer that there was no such thing as a binary-only module, but 
> IMO binary-only is better than no support whatsoever.

If the module works in user-space Linux, problem solved.