Re: 2 GB file limitation

["Gábor Lénárt" <lgb@lgb.hu>]

On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:59:49AM -0400, safemode wrote:
> > Yes, gcc3 is (well at least NOW) a piece of shit. It produces BIGGER and
> > SLOWER binaries ... Checked on: Athlon, AMD K6-2.
> > With the same gcc command line ...
> 
> gcc 3.0.2 produces lame binaries that are 45 seconds faster encoding 
> 74minutes of audio than the gcc 2.95.4 binaries with the same cflags.   
> gcc 2.95.4 produces a binary of 39432 bytes when gcc 3.0.2 with the same 
> flags on the same source produces a binary of 37452 bytes.  I then tested it 
> with lame.  gcc 2.95.4 produced a binary of 245664 bytes and 3.0.2 produced 
> one of 238016 bytes.  Same exact cflags and settings. 
> So basically my testing absolutely contradicts your statement.  So who is 
> right? 

Well, you may be right. I got my results with the first (pre?)release
of gcc3. I'm going to try gcc 3.0.2 now ... Thanx for the correction.

-- 
 --[ Gábor Lénárt ]---[ Vivendi Telecom Hungary ]---------[ lgb@lgb.hu ]--
 U have 8 bit comp or chip of them and it's unused or to be sold? Call me!
 -------[ +36 30 2270823 ]------> LGB <-----[ Linux/UNIX/8bit 4ever ]-----