This is the previous stateful sysrq patch, plus a 'sysrq-sticky' proc entry, which defaults to off, that controls whether the stateful mode will be used or not. This reworked patch is against 2.4.11-pre2. ++ 02/10/01 10:18 -0400 - Crutcher Dunnavant: > ++ 02/10/01 10:48 +0200 - willy tarreau: > > > I'd suggest either making this behaviour optional, > > or making it > > > so that hitting alt-sysrq twice, without any other > > keys being > > > pressed makes the next key stick. > > > > I agree with you that there's a risk. Mike Harris had > > written a > > patch for 2.2 which did something similar, but > > slightly better > > IMO since it avoids risks of mis-press, handles > > correctly > > broken keyboards and keeps compatible with the > > existing > > method. Basically, it allows the user to press Alt, > > then SysRQ, > > release SysRQ then press the desired key, and later > > release > > Alt. In fact, it only resets the "magic-key-mode" flag > > after Alt > > has been released, and doesn't bother when SysRq is > > released. > > But this would require that alt be pressed. This is not acceptable on > exactly the sort of boards which require this patch. > > I will look at adding a 'sysrq-sticky' entry to proc, which will do the > obvious thing. I think that this should address everyone's concerns. > > -- > Crutcher > GCS d--- s+:>+:- a-- C++++$ UL++++$ L+++$>++++ !E PS+++ PE Y+ PGP+>++++ > R-(+++) !tv(+++) b+(++++) G+ e>++++ h+>++ r* y+>*$ > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Crutcher GCS d--- s+:>+:- a-- C++++$ UL++++$ L+++$>++++ !E PS+++ PE Y+ PGP+>++++ R-(+++) !tv(+++) b+(++++) G+ e>++++ h+>++ r* y+>*$