From: davidsen@tmr.com (bill davidsen)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.11-pre4 remove spurious kernel recompiles
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:19:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200110081619.f98GJ3810641@deathstar.prodigy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23246.1002450342@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>
In article <23246.1002450342@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> kaos@ocs.com.au wrote:
| This patch removes the dependency on the top level Makefile and
| seperates UTS_RELEASE from LINUX_VERSION_CODE. Changing the top level
| Makefile no longer forces a complete recompile. Changing EXTRAVERSION
| only affects a few files. Changing VERSION, PATCHLEVEL or SUBLEVEL
| still does a major recompile, no way around that because of the number
| of places that test LINUX_VERSION_CODE and modules that need the kernel
| version string.
I'll let comments accumulate on this, but it seems to offer hope that
patching a few modules and changing the EXTRAVERSION so they go in their
own directory will not blow off eight minutes of time to recompile.
That's nice, assuming it works.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"If I were a diplomat, in the best case I'd go hungry. In the worst
case, people would die."
-- Robert Lipe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-08 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-07 10:25 Keith Owens
2001-10-07 18:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-07 18:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-10-07 23:29 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-08 0:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-08 0:42 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-08 1:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-08 1:34 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-08 2:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-08 2:49 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-08 3:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-08 17:56 ` bill davidsen
2001-10-08 16:19 ` bill davidsen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200110081619.f98GJ3810641@deathstar.prodigy.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®