From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alan Cox <laughing@shared-source.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac11
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 04:22:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011011042228.A10133@emma1.emma.line.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011011001617.A4636@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20011011001617.A4636@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> * Small fixes to various long standing bugs, various architecture and
> * driver cleanups. The 2.4.10-ac tree now seems pretty solid.
> *
>
> 2.4.10-ac11
> o Further VM tuning (Rik van Riel)
Short version: Kicks ass!
Long version: the sluggishness that 2.4.9, 2.4.10 and the previous -ac
versions suffered from (not sure if 2.4.7 was also sluggish) seems to be
gone, the machine is much quieter now and does not look like paralysed
for seconds every now and then. Stress tests need to be done, but a make
-j on various DJB tools which would start up only slowly now quickly
zoom through.
However, one thing strikes me on boot: ext3fs claims it's 0.9.6, while
the ext3 web site tells us about 0.9.10. What's going on with 2.4.x-ac
ext3fs? Should I be concerned?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-11 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-10 23:16 Alan Cox
2001-10-11 2:22 ` Matthias Andree [this message]
2001-10-11 2:59 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-11 4:34 ` Daniel T. Chen
2001-10-11 8:13 ` Steffen Moser
2001-10-11 2:59 ` Linux 2.4.10-ac11: swapoff frees memory + swap? Matthias Andree
2001-10-12 21:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2001-10-11 3:04 ` Linux 2.4.10-ac11 Tom Diehl
2001-10-11 3:06 ` Tom Rini
2001-10-11 3:30 ` Tom Rini
2001-10-11 22:03 ` Tom Rini
2001-10-11 6:52 ` Miles Lane
2001-10-11 15:01 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011011042228.A10133@emma1.emma.line.org \
--to=matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de \
--cc=laughing@shared-source.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®