mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oden Eriksson <oden.eriksson@kvikkjokk.net>
To: Tim Moore <timothymoore@bigfoot.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Which kernel (Linus or ac)?
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 01:50:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011011235033Z277082-760+24288@vger.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20011011094548.jkp@riker.nailed.org> <3BC5E3AF.588D0A55@lexus.com> <3BC5EB56.21B4EF88@bigfoot.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BC5EB56.21B4EF88@bigfoot.com>

On Thursdayen den 11 October 2001 20.56, Tim Moore wrote:
> J Sloan wrote:
> > Tim Moore wrote:
> > > Any special reason to use 2.4?
> >
> > er... scalability, performance, features?
>
> Observations based on Roswell 2 and identical Abit BP6's: faster disk
> I/O and kernel builds (same options), smoother X11 performance (SVGA),
> higher LAN network I/O (switched LNE100TX) under heavy loads, and, none
> of the recent latency or VM issues.  As for features, I don't need any
> new feature specific to 2.4.

Hi, sorry for intruding, but what is Roswell2?

And, I also have a Abit BP6. Do you really mean that 2.2.19+ has better 
performance?

Maybe i should go back using an older kernel to test it. On this machine I 
have 2 30GB IBM disks on the HPT controller in raid 0+1, I could try som 
benchmarking with bonnie.

> > > I only use 2.2.19p8 and 2.2.20p10 where
> > > stability is important.
> >
> > experimental pre-releases? interesting...
>
> I see your point but everything since 2.2.19p2 been stable for my NFS
> and app server testing needs as well as primary desktop machine.
>
> rgds,
> tim.

-- 
Oden Eriksson, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
Mandrake Linux release 8.1 (Vitamin) for i586, kernel 2.4.10-2mdksmp. Uptime: 
2 days

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-10-11 23:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-11 14:45 jkp
2001-10-11 17:42 ` Robert Love
2001-10-11 17:52 ` Tim Connors
2001-10-11 18:11 ` Tim Moore
2001-10-12  2:01   ` Horst von Brand
     [not found]     ` <001901c152ca$0b42c080$0600000a@petersohn.net>
2001-10-12 18:32       ` Tim Moore
2001-10-11 18:13 ` Tim Moore
2001-10-11 18:23   ` J Sloan
2001-10-11 18:56     ` Tim Moore
2001-10-11 19:59       ` [OT] " J Sloan
2001-10-12  4:42         ` T. A.
2001-10-12  6:07           ` J Sloan
2001-10-12  9:14             ` T. A.
2001-10-12  9:59               ` Luigi Genoni
2001-10-12 17:35               ` J Sloan
2001-10-12 22:59                 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-10-11 23:50       ` Oden Eriksson [this message]
2001-10-11 23:56         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-10-12  0:09         ` J Sloan
2001-10-12  4:37     ` T. A.
2001-10-12  6:56       ` Ville Herva
2001-10-12  9:25         ` T. A.
2001-10-12 10:02           ` Ville Herva
2001-10-12 11:35         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-11 19:43   ` M. R. Brown
2001-10-11 22:05 ` Luigi Genoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011011235033Z277082-760+24288@vger.kernel.org \
    --to=oden.eriksson@kvikkjokk.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=timothymoore@bigfoot.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®