mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "José Luis Domingo López" <jdomingo@internautas.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4.11 & 2.4.12 are much slower
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:14:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011012141449.A6168@dardhal.mired.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200110121206.f9CC6XV01124@spnew.snpe.co.yu>
In-Reply-To: <200110121206.f9CC6XV01124@spnew.snpe.co.yu>

On Friday, 12 October 2001, at 14:06:32 +0200,
snpe wrote:

> Hello,
> 	I try kernel 2.4.11 and 2.4.12 (RH 7.1, gcc-2.96-81, celeron 300 mhz
> 256 mb ram, ide ata 100 ibm)
> 	I compile kernel with 2.4.11 - 110 minutes (with any other 40 min)
> KDE 2.2.1 is unresponsible and I back in 2.4.10
> 
Don't know about the problem you seem to experience. But it seems your
machine is completely broken both with 2.4.10 and 2.4.1[12]. A kernel
compile on such hardware that lasts 40 minutes is absolutely unusual.

My PC is a 166 Pentium (even no MMX), 64 MB RAM, and a hard disk that
bonnie reports having a maximun R/W performance of only 4 MB/s. With this
hardware, and kernel 2.4.11, a compilation of kernel 2.4.12 + some 
modules (100 in total), also running icewm, X 4.1, Mozilla, Xchat,
gkrellm, xawtv, several rxvt's and more, total compilation time for kernel
+ modules (make dep clean bzImage modules) is 65 minutes. And, in the
middle of the compilation, cron.daily was run.

So maybe there is a problem with kernel 2.4.1[12] on your setup, but it
seems that also your base hardware is not working as it should.

Greetings.

-- 
José Luis Domingo López
Linux Registered User #189436     Debian Linux Woody (P166 64 MB RAM)
 
jdomingo EN internautas PUNTO org  => ¿ Spam ? Atente a las consecuencias
jdomingo AT internautas DOT   org  => Spam at your own risk


  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-12 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-12 12:06 snpe
2001-10-12 14:14 ` José Luis Domingo López [this message]
2001-10-13  9:22 ` How to install the linux source tree? Rachel Chew
2001-10-12 11:34   ` Hacksaw
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-12 10:56 Kernel 2.4.11 & 2.4.12 are much slower Rui Ribeiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011012141449.A6168@dardhal.mired.net \
    --to=jdomingo@internautas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®