mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rwhron@earthlink.net
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: rwhron@earthlink.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: VM test on 2.4.13-pre3aa1 (compared to 2.4.12-aa1 and 2.4.13-pre2aa1)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 00:48:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011017004839.A15996@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011016081639.A209@earthlink.net> <20011017021242.S2380@athlon.random> <20011017043103.D2380@athlon.random>
In-Reply-To: <20011017043103.D2380@athlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 04:31:03AM +0200

On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 04:31:03AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I noticed that anotehr thing that changed between vanilla 2.4.13pre2 and
> 2.4.13pre3 is the setting of page_cluster on machine with lots of ram.
> 
> You'll now find the page_cluster set to 6, that means "1 << 6 << 12"
> bytes will be paged in at each major fault, while previously only "1 <<
> 4 << 12" bytes were paged in.
> 
> So I'd suggest to try again after "echo 4 > /proc/sys/vm/page-cluster"
> to see if it makes any difference.
> 
> Andrea

You Rule!

The tweak to page-cluster is basically magic for this test.

With page-cluster=4, the mp3blaster sputtered like 2.4.13pre2aa1.
Better, but not beautiful.

Real beauty happens with page-cluster=2.  There is virtually no sputter.  
And the wall clock time is a little better than 2.4.13pre2aa1!

I don't know what page-cluster size is best for everything, but 
2.4.12aa1 (which was very good IMHO), sputtered about 10 seconds per 
iteration, and each iteration took 64 seconds.

2.4.13pre3aa1 with no sputters:  48 seconds.

Amazing!

Also, interactive "feel" is much better too.  This test would
really brutalize keyboard response.  With 2.4.13-pre3aa1 and 
page-cluster=2, the box is still usable.  (for more than listening
to mp3's  :))

page-cluster = 6

Averages for 10 mtest01 runs
bytes allocated:                    1236166246
User time (seconds):                2.299
System time (seconds):              2.951
Elapsed (wall clock) time:          41.969
Percent of CPU this job got:        12.00
Major (requiring I/O) page faults:  113.5
Minor (reclaiming a frame) faults:  302580.3

page-cluster = 4

Averages for 10 mtest01 runs
bytes allocated:                    1237529395
User time (seconds):                2.097
System time (seconds):              2.788
Elapsed (wall clock) time:          49.394
Percent of CPU this job got:        9.50
Major (requiring I/O) page faults:  120.3
Minor (reclaiming a frame) faults:  302914.1

page-cluster = 2

Averages for 10 mtest01 runs
bytes allocated:                    1239521689
User time (seconds):                2.051
System time (seconds):              2.785
Elapsed (wall clock) time:          47.878
Percent of CPU this job got:        9.80
Major (requiring I/O) page faults:  114.0
Minor (reclaiming a frame) faults:  303399.7

The wall clock time went up somewhat from page-cluster=6. 
Here is where we were before:

2.4.13-pre2aa1

Averages for 10 mtest01 runs
bytes allocated:                    1245184000
User time (seconds):                2.050
System time (seconds):              2.874
Elapsed (wall clock) time:          49.513
Percent of CPU this job got:        9.70
Major (requiring I/O) page faults:  115.6
Minor (reclaiming a frame) faults:  304781.9

2.4.12aa1

Averages for 10 mtest01 runs
bytes allocated:                    1253362892
User time (seconds):                2.099
System time (seconds):              2.823
Elapsed (wall clock) time:          64.109
Percent of CPU this job got:        7.50
Major (requiring I/O) page faults:  135.2
Minor (reclaiming a frame) faults:  306779.8


-- 
Randy Hron


  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-17  4:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-16 12:16 rwhron
2001-10-17  0:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-17  1:32   ` Beau Kuiper
2001-10-17  2:09     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-18 19:36       ` bill davidsen
2001-10-18 23:27         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-17  2:31   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-17  4:48     ` rwhron [this message]
2001-10-17 16:27       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-17 15:19         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-10-18 19:45       ` Bill Davidsen
2001-10-17  3:59   ` rwhron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011017004839.A15996@earthlink.net \
    --to=rwhron@earthlink.net \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®