From: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
To: "Peter Wächtler" <pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de>
Cc: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFS related Oops in 2.4.[39]-xfs
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 09:50:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200110171450.f9HEodJ17523@jen.americas.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Peter =?iso-8859-1?Q?W=E4chtler?= <pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de> of "Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:53:19 +0200." <3BCD8D4F.B26684B@loewe-komp.de>
> Peter Wdchtler wrote:
> >
> > Steve Lord wrote:
> > >
> > > Where did you get your kernel (the 2.4.9 version that is) this problem
> > > sounds familiar, but I am pretty sure we fixed this case in XFS somewhere
> > > between 2.4.3 and 2.4.9.
> > >
> >
> > The following diff was made in 2.4.4.
> >
> > diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.4.4/linux/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c linux/fs/nfsd/n
> fsfh.c
> > --- v2.4.4/linux/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c Fri Feb 9 11:29:44 2001
> > +++ linux/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c Sat May 19 17:47:55 2001
> > @@ -244,6 +245,11 @@
> > */
> > pdentry = child->d_inode->i_op->lookup(child->d_inode, tdentry);
> > d_drop(tdentry); /* we never want ".." hashed */
> > + if (!pdentry && tdentry->d_inode == NULL) {
> > + /* File system cannot find ".." ... sad but possible */
> > + dput(tdentry);
> > + pdentry = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > + }
> >
> > But it would not prevent the code path 2.4.3-xfs hit.
> > pdentry is !=NULL and tdentry->d_inode is always NULL after d_alloc():611
> >
>
> Damn. pdentry IS NULL.
> Sorry, the patch would prevent the crash.
OK, I am back again....
I went and looked through xfs code changes, and the 2.4.9 patch should
have some changes in it related to this type of issue. However, you would
have to be using xfsdump to trigger them I think, or possibly the xfs_fsr
program. The combination of xfsdump and an nfs server did have some problems.
So, does this tie in with your configuation? It does not however explain
problems in 2.4.9. There was just a recent code cleanup of the code paths
used by xfsdump (post 2.4.12 patch), but I am not aware of any other XFS
changes in this area.
XFS does work OK with the new VM, so you can try later kernels if you want,
I am not aware of anyone else having problems with XFS which appear dcache
related.
Steve (slightly stumped and in need of coffee)
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-17 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-17 9:14 Peter Wächtler
2001-10-17 9:28 ` Steve Lord
2001-10-17 10:00 ` Peter Wächtler
2001-10-17 10:58 ` NET_PROFILE results for 2.4.12 [was sentto is slow] Martin Devera
2001-10-17 13:42 ` NFS related Oops in 2.4.[39]-xfs Peter Wächtler
2001-10-17 13:53 ` Peter Wächtler
2001-10-17 14:50 ` Steve Lord [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200110171450.f9HEodJ17523@jen.americas.sgi.com \
--to=lord@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®