From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 17:53:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 17:53:41 -0400 Received: from mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.50]:2988 "EHLO mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 17:53:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 17:53:55 -0400 From: khromy To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: new Rik` patch kicks ass Message-ID: <20011017175355.A20437@lnuxlab.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <200110172139.f9HLdVt01368@vegae.deep.net> <3BCE0ACE.9000006@brsat.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3BCE0ACE.9000006@brsat.com.br>; from roberto@brsat.com.br on Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 07:48:46PM -0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 07:48:46PM -0300, Roberto Orenstein wrote: > Just to complement with another success case :) > The patch improved my system response with high load pretty much. > Now i'm even able to stress the system with quintela's memtest suite and > keep using the machine, wich was nearly impossible without the patch Same here.. -- L1: khromy ;khromy at lnuxlab.ath.cx