mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, forming@home.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: VM testing with mtest, 2.4.12-ac3, 2.4.12-ac3+riel's patches, and 2.4.13aa1
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:06:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011018090646.B1144@turbolinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011018015112.A3763@cy599856-a.home.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011018015112.A3763@cy599856-a.home.com>

On Oct 18, 2001  01:51 -0500, Josh McKinney wrote:
> This is a report of the mtest01 scripts posted by rwhron@earthlink.net
> a day orso ago.
> 
> The numbers are rather interesting.  While the latency of the ac kernels is
> definitely better, the song only dropped out for a second or two in the
> begining but that was it.  The aa kernel drops out more frequently throughout
> the test, but the amount of memory allocated is almost twice as much as with
> the ac kernels.

-ac kernel:
> Averages for 10 mtest01 runs
> bytes allocated:                    134427443.2
> User time (seconds):                2.546
> System time (seconds):              1.370
> Elapsed (wall clock) time:          4.798
> Percent of CPU this job got:        89.1%
> Major (requiring I/O) page faults:  103.8
> Minor (reclaiming a frame) faults:  32702

-ac kernel + Rik's patches:
> Averages for 10 mtest01 runs
> bytes allocated:                    124885401.6
> User time (seconds):                2.380
> System time (seconds):              1.253
> Elapsed (wall clock) time:          4.401
> Percent of CPU this job got:        89.1%
> Major (requiring I/O) page faults:  100.2
> Minor (reclaiming a frame) faults:  30363.3

Linus kernel:
> Averages for 10 mtest01 runs
> bytes allocated:                    288148684.8
> User time (seconds):                5.496
> System time (seconds):              3.003
> Elapsed (wall clock) time:          12.250
> Percent of CPU this job got:        68.9%
> Major (requiring I/O) page faults:  103.5
> Minor (reclaiming a frame) faults:  70380.6

Note that the Linus kernel has allocated twice as much memory.  What does that
mean exactly?  The user/system/wall time is also twice as high.  Somehow I
don't think you are having an equal test.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger  \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
                 \  would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/               -- Dogbert


  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-18 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-18  6:51 Josh McKinney
2001-10-18 15:06 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2001-10-18 17:26   ` Josh McKinney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011018090646.B1144@turbolinux.com \
    --to=adilger@turbolabs.com \
    --cc=forming@home.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®