From: safemode <safemode@speakeasy.net>
To: Andrei Lahun <Uman@editec-lotteries.com>
Cc: Uman@editec-lotteries.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: problems with I/O performance with 2.4.12-ac3
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 20:16:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011020001546Z278700-17408+2563@vger.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011019163058.1bb7c6f7.uman@chert> <20011019191446.7748bd80.uman@chert>
In-Reply-To: <20011019191446.7748bd80.uman@chert>
On Friday 19 October 2001 13:14, Andrei Lahun wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:27:35 -0400
>
> safemode <safemode@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > You should give ide and drive chipset info. This is not a problem seen
> > by everyone using the ac3 kernel. Mine for instance run just fine. What
> > settings did you use with bonnie++? all of this is required info if
> > someone wanted to look and see why you are getting those numbers.
>
> My chipset is VIA apollo 133-A ( old shirt).
> I have run bonnie++ just like bonnie -s 256 , and i have 128 MB of memory,
> disk is MAXTOR 52049H4.With old kernels i always had results something like
> i have with 2.4.13-pre now . And i have read one post in lkml about 2 times
> less write output with 2.4.13 -pre comparing with ac, mine result are
> opposite.
2.4.12-ac3-preempt-hogstop (no vm patches after the hogstop patch of a
couple days ago).
PDC20262: chipset revision 1
(my drive on the VIA vt82c686a (rev 22) is too full to run the test)
Maxtor 32049H2, ATA DISK drive
All tests were done on this drive.
(not clean boot)
test results (bonnie++) no extra arguments.
Version 1.02 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
--Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
--Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec
%CP
psuedomode 1504M 6668 95 27108 39 5429 8 6217 82 22005 11 76.9
0
------Sequential Create------ --------Random
Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
-Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec
%CP
16 1501 97 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 1548 99 +++++ +++ 4056
99
psuedomode,1504M,6668,95,27108,39,5429,8,6217,82,22005,11,76.9,0,16,1501,97,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,1548,99,+++++,+++,4056,99
hdparm results
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.26 seconds = 28.32 MB/sec
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.00 seconds =128.00 MB/sec
(run in that order)
dbench results (./dbench 32)
Throughput 47.3829 MB/sec (NB=59.2286 MB/sec 473.829 MBit/sec)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-20 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-19 14:30 Andrei Lahun
2001-10-19 13:27 ` safemode
2001-10-19 17:14 ` Andrei Lahun
2001-10-20 0:16 ` safemode [this message]
2001-10-19 15:53 Dmitry Volkoff
2001-10-22 12:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011020001546Z278700-17408+2563@vger.kernel.org \
--to=safemode@speakeasy.net \
--cc=Uman@editec-lotteries.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome