From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 13:44:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 13:44:11 -0400 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:26895 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 13:44:05 -0400 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200110211744.VAA31843@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: how to see manually specified proxy arp entries using "ip neigh" To: ja@ssi.bg (Julian Anastasov) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 21:44:17 +0400 (MSK DST) Cc: saw@saw.sw.com.sg, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Julian Anastasov" at Oct 20, 1 07:56:47 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > I can tell you what Alexey and Andrey will answer on netdev :) > Make proxyarp a route flag. It was Andrey's suggestion. I even do not know whether he still believes that it is right. At least, his last note was that he does not believe to routing tables more. :-) What's about me, it does not cause an emetic reflex. However I am not sure that it is really convenient solution. Alexey