mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Herva <vherva@niksula.hut.fi>
To: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.gmd.de>
Cc: cdwrite@other.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.10ac10, cdrecord 1.9-6, Mitsumi CR-4804TE: lock up burning too large image
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 20:25:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011021202502.D1598@niksula.cs.hut.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200110211210.f9LCAIl08971@burner.fokus.gmd.de>
In-Reply-To: <200110211210.f9LCAIl08971@burner.fokus.gmd.de>; from schilling@fokus.gmd.de on Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 02:10:18PM +0200

On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 02:10:18PM +0200, you [Joerg Schilling] claimed:
> 
> >Ok. I'll compile the newest from source.
> 
> >But do you think the too-large-image lock up might be cured with a newer
> >cdrecord, or should is the kernel the prime suspect?
> 
> It least recent libscg versions include a workaround for an incorrect
> Linux kernel return for a timed out SCSI command via ATAPI. So if the kernel 
> does return at all, cdrecord will know why.

Bummer. I'm not able to reproduce it with

progress -c 1M < /dev/zero | cdrecord dev=0,1,0 speed=4 -dummy -
(essentially same as 'cdrecord dev=0,1,0 speed=4 -dummy - < /dev/zero')

(The line I originally used was "cdrecord dev=0,1,0 speed=4 -" and the input
was from mkisofs.)

cdrecord-1.9-6

  686.00 MB; elapsed 1172 secs; 0.59 MB/s...
  cdrecord: Input/output error. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: retryable error
  CDB:  2A 00 00 05 53 E1 00 00 1F 00
  status: 0x0 (GOOD STATUS)
  write track data: error after 715065344 bytes
  Sense Bytes: 70 00 00 00 00 00 00 0A 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

and cdrecord 1.11a08

  686.00 MB; elapsed 1172 secs; 0.59 MB/s...
  ./cdrecord: Input/output error. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: no error
  CDB:  2A 00 00 05 53 E1 00 00 1F 00
  status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION)
  Sense Bytes: 71 00 03 00 00 00 00 0A 00 00 00 00 0C 00 00 00
  Sense Key: 0x3 Medium Error, deferred error, Segment 0
  Sense Code: 0x0C Qual 0x00 (write error) Fru 0x0
  Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid)
  cmd finished after 5.706s timeout 40s
  write track data: error after 715065344 bytes
  Sense Bytes: 70 00 00 00 00 00 00 0A 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

(nothing in dmesg.)

Perhaps it really takes real write to trigger this or the cd media in
question was somehow flawed. I try again, when I have more time.


-- v --

v@iki.fi

  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-21 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-21 12:10 Joerg Schilling
2001-10-21 17:25 ` Ville Herva [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-22  5:48 Paul Kreiner
2001-10-21 11:56 Joerg Schilling
2001-10-21 12:08 ` Ville Herva
     [not found] <200110211137.f9LBb1w08887@burner.fokus.gmd.de>
2001-10-21 11:46 ` Ville Herva
2001-10-21 10:54 Ville Herva
2001-10-22 19:03 ` bill davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011021202502.D1598@niksula.cs.hut.fi \
    --to=vherva@niksula.hut.fi \
    --cc=cdwrite@other.debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schilling@fokus.gmd.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®