From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: "Mohammad A. Haque" <mhaque@haque.net>,
Terminator <jimmy@mtc.dhs.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel 2.4.14 compiling fail for loop device
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 20:29:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011105202948.C665@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E290D3DA-D26B-11D5-A0A2-00306569F1C6@haque.net> <1005020081.897.4.camel@phantasy>
In-Reply-To: <1005020081.897.4.camel@phantasy>
On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 11:14:40PM -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> On Mon, 2001-11-05 at 23:08, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> > Safe to remove those two lines from loop.c? Other calls of deactive_page
> > were just removed it seemed.
>
> Yes, it is. I am sure that will be exactly what 2.4.15-pre1 does.
>
This is why 2.4.14 should've been 2.4.14pre9!
I thought Linus was going to keep the changes from pre to final to a
minimum. Actually, I don't think there should be *any* difference between
the last pre and the released kernel...
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-06 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-06 3:39 Terminator
2001-11-06 3:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-06 4:02 ` Robert Love
2001-11-06 4:08 ` Mohammad A. Haque
2001-11-06 4:14 ` Robert Love
2001-11-06 4:29 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2001-11-07 12:13 ` Todd M. Roy
2001-11-07 20:49 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
2001-11-07 21:11 ` Mohammad A. Haque
2001-11-07 21:34 ` J Sloan
2001-11-07 11:58 ` rpjday
2001-11-07 21:44 ` J Sloan
2001-11-07 21:41 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
2001-11-07 21:40 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
2001-11-07 3:13 ` Are -final releases realy FINAL? (Was Re: kernel 2.4.14 compiling fail for loop device) Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-11-07 3:17 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-07 3:27 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-11-07 3:24 ` Michael H. Warfield
2001-11-07 4:06 ` David Lang
[not found] <no.id>
2001-11-07 15:12 ` kernel 2.4.14 compiling fail for loop device Barry K. Nathan
2001-11-07 15:21 ` Todd M. Roy
2001-11-07 15:38 ` Mohammad A. Haque
2001-11-07 15:48 ` Mohammad A. Haque
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011105202948.C665@mikef-linux.matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=jimmy@mtc.dhs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhaque@haque.net \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome