mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Step 1 B <step1b@cyberspace.org>
To: Tyler BIRD <BIRDTY@uvsc.edu>,
	step1b@cyberspace.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: regd kernel compilation
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:09:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011106130955.A15828@grex.cyberspace.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sbe7bac4.014@MAIL-SMTP.uvsc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <sbe7bac4.014@MAIL-SMTP.uvsc.edu>; from Tyler BIRD on Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 10:25:43AM -0700

The number of hardware ettings is just too many,and so I  fear
I may go somewhere  wrong. so I want it the automatic way only.

1. Is this approach been discussed earlier too ? How easy/tough is it 
  to do it ? how good/bad is it ?

2. How is hardware detected ? Which part of the kernel source should
I look at ?

Again, please cc me the responses.



On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 10:25:43AM -0700, Tyler BIRD wrote:
> Do you mean hardware detection during kernel compilation?
> the /proc filesystem lists devices that are currently present on your system
> int /proc/devices I think.  But for the most part I just know what kind of hardware
> I have and configure the kernel appropriately.  In the config scripts you can leave
> off any modules that aren't needed.  Compile them as a module or compile them into the
> kernel image.
> 
> do a make menuconfig, or if you have X make xconfig
> and enable/disable all of your hardware.
> 
> Tyler
> 
> 
> >>> Step 1 B <step1b@cyberspace.org> 11/06/01 10:17AM >>>
> 
> Hi
> During the processing of compiling the kernel and getting it running, I
> observed that my kernel not only contains software for my current hardware
> configuration, but also for other hardware as well.(both in the kernel and
> as modules). and during bootup, the kernel identifies the hardware and
> either uses the concened part in the kernel, or loads the concerned
> module. Cant this be done during compilation(ie., kernel building) itself
> so that I get a smaller kernel and a smaller set of modules on my disk ? 
> Or is just that the current kernel compilation framework does not support
> this ? 
> 
> Note that I do not know what hardware I have, so I want the 
> compilation scripts to identify the hardware and make the correct and minimal config.
> 
> 
> 
> I am not on this mailing list, so please
> cc me any responses.
> 
> thanks
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

       reply	other threads:[~2001-11-06 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <sbe7bac4.014@MAIL-SMTP.uvsc.edu>
2001-11-06 18:09 ` Step 1 B [this message]
2001-11-06 17:17 Step 1 B
2001-11-07  3:27 ` Keith Owens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011106130955.A15828@grex.cyberspace.org \
    --to=step1b@cyberspace.org \
    --cc=BIRDTY@uvsc.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®