From: Step 1 B <step1b@cyberspace.org>
To: Tyler BIRD <BIRDTY@uvsc.edu>,
step1b@cyberspace.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: regd kernel compilation
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:09:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011106130955.A15828@grex.cyberspace.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sbe7bac4.014@MAIL-SMTP.uvsc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <sbe7bac4.014@MAIL-SMTP.uvsc.edu>; from Tyler BIRD on Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 10:25:43AM -0700
The number of hardware ettings is just too many,and so I fear
I may go somewhere wrong. so I want it the automatic way only.
1. Is this approach been discussed earlier too ? How easy/tough is it
to do it ? how good/bad is it ?
2. How is hardware detected ? Which part of the kernel source should
I look at ?
Again, please cc me the responses.
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 10:25:43AM -0700, Tyler BIRD wrote:
> Do you mean hardware detection during kernel compilation?
> the /proc filesystem lists devices that are currently present on your system
> int /proc/devices I think. But for the most part I just know what kind of hardware
> I have and configure the kernel appropriately. In the config scripts you can leave
> off any modules that aren't needed. Compile them as a module or compile them into the
> kernel image.
>
> do a make menuconfig, or if you have X make xconfig
> and enable/disable all of your hardware.
>
> Tyler
>
>
> >>> Step 1 B <step1b@cyberspace.org> 11/06/01 10:17AM >>>
>
> Hi
> During the processing of compiling the kernel and getting it running, I
> observed that my kernel not only contains software for my current hardware
> configuration, but also for other hardware as well.(both in the kernel and
> as modules). and during bootup, the kernel identifies the hardware and
> either uses the concened part in the kernel, or loads the concerned
> module. Cant this be done during compilation(ie., kernel building) itself
> so that I get a smaller kernel and a smaller set of modules on my disk ?
> Or is just that the current kernel compilation framework does not support
> this ?
>
> Note that I do not know what hardware I have, so I want the
> compilation scripts to identify the hardware and make the correct and minimal config.
>
>
>
> I am not on this mailing list, so please
> cc me any responses.
>
> thanks
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-06 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <sbe7bac4.014@MAIL-SMTP.uvsc.edu>
2001-11-06 18:09 ` Step 1 B [this message]
2001-11-06 17:17 Step 1 B
2001-11-07 3:27 ` Keith Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011106130955.A15828@grex.cyberspace.org \
--to=step1b@cyberspace.org \
--cc=BIRDTY@uvsc.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®