From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 05:09:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 05:09:18 -0500 Received: from hazard.jcu.cz ([160.217.1.6]:31130 "HELO hazard.jcu.cz") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 05:09:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:07:02 +0100 From: Jan Marek To: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: Cannot unlock spinlock... Was: Problem in yenta.c, 2nd edition Message-ID: <20011107110702.D11351@hazard.jcu.cz> In-Reply-To: <20011107104044.C11351@hazard.jcu.cz> <20011106123427.A11351@hazard.jcu.cz> <3BE2D37A.D32C6DB1@zip.com.au> <20011105112900.C5919@hazard.jcu.cz> <23001.1005086449@redhat.com> <11670.1005127189@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11670.1005127189@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hallo, On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 09:59:49AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > linux@hazard.jcu.cz said: > > Your hack is working for me. I got message: "IRQ storm detected on > > IRQ 11. Disabling" > > > and everythink works OK. Spinlock was unlocked, procedure setup_irq() > > ended and PCMCIA package works fine... > > > It is possible to add your patch to the kernel? > > Absolutely not. In 2.5, we may have some code to deal with IRQ storms, but > certainly not like that. OK... But shall I apply your patch on every kernel while not exist 2.5 kernel tree? > > > But I don't know, what device asserted IRQ 11 to start the IRQ storm.. > > What other PCI devices claim to be on IRQ 11? Do you have ACPI enabled (in > the BIOS and/or in Linux)? I have ACPI enabled and I'm attaching my lspci -vvv... Thank you very much... > -- > dwmw2 Sincerely Jan Marek -- Ing. Jan Marek University of South Bohemia Academic Computer Centre Phone: +420-38-7772080