From: John Levon <moz@compsoc.man.ac.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel.
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 00:27:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011108002705.A45912@compsoc.man.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F218Wqr2f9hYDkngMUJ00002181@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F218Wqr2f9hYDkngMUJ00002181@hotmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 02:41:26PM -0500, William Knop wrote:
> You really consider this discussion to be unimportant? Granted, the lack of
> organization in /proc is not a bug, but keeping the kernel organized is part
> of maintenence. Like cleaning my room-- it's not a showstopper if it is
> messy, but it is nicer and easier to work in when neat.
Like cleaning your room, talking endlessly about how doesn't get you anywhere.
Show some code ...
john
--
"This bulletin discusses three security vulnerabilities that are unrelated
except in the sense that both affect ISA Server 2000"
- Microsoft Product Security
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-08 0:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <w_knop@hotmail.com>
2001-11-07 19:41 ` William Knop
2001-11-08 0:27 ` John Levon [this message]
2001-11-08 8:56 ` Erik Hensema
2001-11-08 10:00 ` Remco Post
2001-11-09 16:44 ` Ricky Beam
2001-11-12 13:31 ` Horst von Brand
2001-11-12 14:31 ` Martin Dalecki
2001-11-07 21:13 Brenneke, Matthew Jeffrey (UMR-Student)
2001-11-08 0:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-08 0:20 ` antirez
2001-11-08 0:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-08 0:54 ` David Ford
2001-11-08 1:10 ` antirez
2001-11-08 1:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-08 1:51 ` antirez
2001-11-08 0:44 ` Stephen Satchell
2001-11-08 1:04 ` antirez
2001-11-08 0:55 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-11-08 3:07 ` Stuart Young
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-07 19:09 Erik Hensema
2001-11-07 19:27 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-07 19:42 ` Daniel R. Warner
2001-11-07 22:35 ` Allen Campbell
2001-11-07 20:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-07 21:19 ` Justin A
2001-11-07 23:44 ` Rusty Russell
2001-11-08 0:35 ` Stephen Satchell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011108002705.A45912@compsoc.man.ac.uk \
--to=moz@compsoc.man.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®