From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: "Zvi Har'El" <rl@math.technion.ac.il>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Nadav Har'El" <nyh@math.technion.ac.il>
Subject: Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 07:11:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011108071151.A16254@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BEA6725.739463C2@redhat.com> <Pine.GSO.4.33.0111081407130.28492-100000@leeor.math.technion.ac.il>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0111081407130.28492-100000@leeor.math.technion.ac.il>; from rl@math.technion.ac.il on Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 02:10:58PM +0200
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 02:10:58PM +0200, Zvi Har'El wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> >
> > The basic idea is "everything which can be a module will be a module",
> > even scsi is a module. And if you use grub, it's 100% transparent as the
> > initrd
> > will be automatically added to the grub config when you install the RH
> > kernel rpm;
> > even if you use lilo the initrd is supposed to be made for you
>
> Is there no overhead (except in boot time) in using initrd?
The initrd memory is freed during the initial boot so there's no overhead.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-08 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-07 15:00 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-07 15:23 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-07 15:28 ` Zvi Har'El
2001-11-07 20:19 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-07 21:11 ` Zvi Har'El
2001-11-07 21:25 ` Christian Bornträger
2001-11-07 21:45 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-07 21:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-07 22:11 ` arjan
2001-11-07 21:48 ` arjan
2001-11-08 7:08 ` Zvi Har'El
2001-11-08 11:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-11-08 12:10 ` Zvi Har'El
2001-11-08 12:11 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2001-11-08 11:35 ` ramfs leak Padraig Brady
2001-11-07 16:31 ` ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs James A Sutherland
2001-11-07 19:38 ` Ville Herva
2001-11-07 20:44 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-07 21:11 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-07 21:37 ` ext3 vs resizerfs " Ville Herva
2001-11-07 21:45 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-08 0:13 ` ext3 vs resiserfs " James A Sutherland
2001-11-07 19:50 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2001-11-07 20:24 ` Robert Love
2001-11-07 20:35 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-07 20:27 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-07 18:40 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-07 19:12 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-07 20:36 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-07 19:40 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-07 20:15 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-07 21:33 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-07 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-07 22:27 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-07 22:56 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-07 23:18 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-07 22:52 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-07 22:59 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-07 23:36 ` D. Stimits
2001-11-07 23:55 ` Mike Castle
2001-11-07 23:38 ` Mike Castle
2001-11-07 23:49 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-08 10:58 ` Juan Quintela
2001-11-07 20:25 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-07 23:33 ` Ryan Cumming
2001-11-09 16:11 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-07 20:21 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-07 20:05 ` Theodore Tso
2001-11-07 20:18 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011108071151.A16254@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nyh@math.technion.ac.il \
--cc=rl@math.technion.ac.il \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome