mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] scheduler cache affinity improvement for 2.4 kernels
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 18:08:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011108180818.A23814@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011108173458.C14468@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.40.0111081752260.1501-100000@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0111081752260.1501-100000@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com>

On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 06:09:29PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> 
> > > The MQ scheduler has the same roots of the proposed one but has a longest
> > > fast path due the try to make global scheduling decisions at every
> > > schedule.
> >
> > Ahh, so that's why it hasn't been adopted...
> 
> Changing the scheduler is not easy ( not to code patches but to make
> everyone agree on the need of changing it ) and as i already said, it's
> easier to force my cat to have a bath instead of Linus to change the
> scheduler :)
>

Hmm, let's see...  You go to the trouble to keep to code tight, and cache
optimized, even raid5 is choosing a little slower implementation for better
cache properties, and then you go and kill it all with the scheduler...
Yep, that makes sence. ;)

Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2001-11-09  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-08 14:30 Ingo Molnar
2001-11-08 15:22 ` M. Edward Borasky
2001-11-08 16:33   ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-08 17:15 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-11-08 18:27   ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-08 18:03     ` Davide Libenzi
2001-11-08 19:40       ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-08 19:13         ` Davide Libenzi
2001-11-08 23:37           ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-09  0:37             ` Davide Libenzi
2001-11-09  1:07               ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-09  1:29                 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-11-09  1:34                   ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-09  2:09                     ` Davide Libenzi
2001-11-09  2:08                       ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2001-11-19 18:34               ` bill davidsen
2001-11-09  8:28             ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-09  8:05               ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-11 21:18               ` Davide Libenzi
2001-11-11 22:31                 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-11-08 23:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-09  0:31 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-11-14  4:56 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-11-14 18:08   ` Davide Libenzi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011108180818.A23814@mikef-linux.matchmail.com \
    --to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®