From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
To: "Tim R." <omarvo@hotmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] extended attributes
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 21:50:58 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011111215058.A630820@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BECEEA2.4030408@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BECEEA2.4030408@hotmail.com>; from omarvo@hotmail.com on Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 04:08:50AM -0500
hi Tim,
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 04:08:50AM -0500, Tim R. wrote:
> I'm glad to see you guys are working on a common acl api for ext2/3 and xfs.
> I was just wondering if this api provided what would be needed for linux
> to support NTFS's acls.
> Now bare in mind I know little about how NTFS's alc's are implimented or
> if they follow POSIX at
> all. But I just thought it might be worth asking the ntfs maintainer if
> the proposed api would be
> adaquit to support ntfs's acls on linux should they ever want to
> impliment this. Might save them
> headaches someday.
The API doesn't favour any one form of ACL - it allows for any
implementation to be layered above it, provided the semantics
of those ACLs can be expressed using extended attributes, of
course.
> Also will it supply the interface needed for other filesystems that have
> been ported that linux that
> support acls? (i.e. will it work for them, could they use it in the
> future if/when they decide to
> impliment that feature) I think JFS might support acls too.
Yes, I believe so. I see EA and ACL support is on the JFS todo
list - I was contacted by some folk at IBM who let me know this,
so there is certainly some interest there.
cheers.
--
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-11 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-10 9:08 Tim R.
2001-11-11 10:50 ` Nathan Scott [this message]
2001-11-12 1:57 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-12 3:20 ` Nathan Scott
2001-11-12 6:21 ` [RFC][PATCH] VFS interface for " Nathan Scott
2001-11-12 6:47 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-12 11:39 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2001-11-13 0:32 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-13 5:27 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-15 5:08 ` Nathan Scott
2001-11-15 6:01 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-15 23:18 ` Nathan Scott
2001-12-03 0:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-12-03 0:54 ` Nathan Scott
2001-12-03 14:52 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-12-03 23:14 ` Nathan Scott
2001-11-13 0:47 ` Anton Altaparmakov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-08 16:47 [RFC][PATCH] " Dean Roehrich
2001-11-08 16:12 Luka Renko
2001-11-08 16:29 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2001-11-07 0:12 Nathan Scott
2001-11-07 0:23 ` Nathan Scott
2001-11-07 1:32 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-07 1:38 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-07 3:19 ` Nathan Scott
2001-11-08 6:48 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-12 5:01 ` Nathan Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011111215058.A630820@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=omarvo@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®