mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw@wittsend.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@gnu.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.15-pre9
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 11:20:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011123112003.B27707@alcove.wittsend.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011122134700.A4966@bee.lk> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111221046170.1479-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111221046170.1479-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>

On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 10:52:03AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 10:44:30PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > > I think I'm ready to hand this over to Marcelo.
> >
> > Aren't you going to include Tim Schmielau's patch to handle uptime larger than
> > 497 days?  It is a cool feature we always liked to have.

> Quite frankly, right now I'm in "handle only bugs that can crash the
> system mode". Anything that takes 497 days to see is fairly low on my
> priority list. My highest priority, in fact, is to get 2.4.15 out without
> any embarrassment.

	Embarrasments like having the modules install into directories
like /lib/modules/2.4.15-greased-turkey or vmlinuz installed to an
image /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.15-greased-turkey?  Those sorts of embarrasments?
Or was that just a last shot to see if we were still awake in 2.4?

	[...]

> 		Linus

	Mike
-- 
 Michael H. Warfield    |  (770) 985-6132   |  mhw@WittsEnd.com
  /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/       |  (678) 463-0932   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9      |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471    |  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-11-23 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-22  6:44 Linux-2.4.15-pre9 Linus Torvalds
2001-11-22  7:47 ` Linux-2.4.15-pre9 Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-11-22 18:52   ` Linux-2.4.15-pre9 Linus Torvalds
2001-11-22 19:34     ` Linux-2.4.15-pre9 Alexander Viro
2001-11-22 19:46       ` Linux-2.4.15-pre9 Tom Rini
2001-11-23 16:20     ` Michael H. Warfield [this message]
2001-11-26 11:52     ` PATCH 2.5.0 kill read_ahead array Martin Dalecki
2001-11-26 16:34       ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-26 16:53         ` Martin Dalecki
2001-11-22 19:16   ` Linux-2.4.15-pre9 Tim Schmielau
2001-11-26 15:18   ` Linux-2.4.15-pre9 bill davidsen
2001-11-22  8:41 ` [PATCH] fix SCSI non-blocksize reads Erik Andersen
2001-11-22 17:09   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-22 17:20     ` Erik Andersen
2001-11-22 18:40       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-24  0:04         ` Erik Andersen
2001-11-22 22:10 Linux-2.4.15-pre9 Leif Sawyer
2001-11-22 22:21 ` Linux-2.4.15-pre9 Linus Torvalds
2001-11-23 16:20   ` Linux-2.4.15-pre9 Jeff Garzik
2001-11-22 22:27 ` Linux-2.4.15-pre9 Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011123112003.B27707@alcove.wittsend.com \
    --to=mhw@wittsend.com \
    --cc=anuradha@gnu.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®