mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nerijus Baliunas <nerijus@users.sourceforge.net>
To: "lgb@lgb.hu" <lgb@lgb.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re[2]: Which gcc version?
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 19:13:30 +0200 (EET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011123171351.CE6C4904A5@mail.delfi.lt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011123125137Z282133-17408+17815@vger.kernel.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20011123135801.00aad970@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <3BFE591B.D1F75CD5@starband.net> <3BFE67E8.CFA0D371@redhat.com> <20011123163019.A5418@vega.digitel2002.hu>
In-Reply-To: <20011123163019.A5418@vega.digitel2002.hu>

On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 16:30:19 +0100 Gábor Lénárt <lgb@lgb.hu> wrote:

GL> True, but as it's known, gcc-2.96 is NOT an official gcc release by the gcc
GL> team. It was RedHat's fault to fetch a development CVS gcc snapshot and
GL> release it as gcc 2.96 in RedHat distributions

There were some good reasons for that - people were faced with new gcc (which now
is 3.0x) features almost a year ago. Now much less software would compile without
problems with gcc 3.x if RH 7.x didn't include gcc 2.96 then...
Anyway, latest gcc 2.96 is very stable, so please stop ranting.

Regards,
Nerijus


  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-11-23 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-23 12:53 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-23 12:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-11-23 13:51 ` war
2001-11-23 19:43   ` J Sloan
2001-11-23 13:59 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 14:11   ` war
2001-11-23 15:14     ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-11-23 15:30       ` Gábor Lénárt
2001-11-23 15:34         ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-11-23 17:13         ` Nerijus Baliunas [this message]
2001-11-23 19:50         ` J Sloan
2001-11-23 20:34           ` John Jasen
2001-11-23 21:55             ` J Sloan
2001-11-24  3:08               ` John Jasen
2001-11-24 12:24             ` Paul G. Allen
2001-11-26 18:31             ` Alan Cox
2001-11-27  8:42               ` Ahmed Masud
2001-11-23 16:10     ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 14:43   ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 16:23     ` Jeff Garzik
2001-11-23 18:30   ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-23 18:56 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 19:28   ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-23 20:14     ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-23 20:24     ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 20:35       ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-23 21:09         ` David Weinehall
2001-11-24 16:01   ` Luigi Genoni
2001-11-24 16:09     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-24 17:32       ` Luigi Genoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011123171351.CE6C4904A5@mail.delfi.lt \
    --to=nerijus@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=lgb@lgb.hu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®