From: "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@it.uc3m.es>
To: Chris Chabot <chabotc@reviewboard.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Severe Linux 2.4 kernel memory leakage
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:27:20 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200111251527.QAA05393@nbd.it.uc3m.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1006699767.1178.0.camel@gandalf.chabotc.com> "from Chris Chabot at Nov 25, 2001 03:49:27 pm"
"A month of sundays ago Chris Chabot wrote:"
> The box has ran Redhat 7.1 and 7.2, with plain vanilla linux kernels
> 2.4.9 upto 2.4.15, in all situations the same problem appeared.
>
> The problem is that when the box boots up, it uses about 60Mb of memory.
> However after only 1 1/2 days, the memory usage is already around 430Mb
> (!!). (this is ofcource used - buffers - cache, as displayed by 'free').
I also have this problem. Unknown circumstances provoke it. Kernel
2.4.9 to 2.4.13. When it occurs I lose about 30MB a day.
Dual 500MHz i686, 4 scsi disks (adaptec) under raid5 and raid0
with 2 intelpro's and 1 IDE disk (and xfs and lvm).
Right now I'm on 2.4.9 and it's NOT happening. Doing nothing different
to any other day.
> When the box keeps on running for about a month, the memory usage gets
> so high that it turns into a swap-crazy, low-memory and slow server ;-/
> (it does free up cache memory, and swaps stuff out, however the 'leaked'
> memory only grows and is never re-claimed).
Same.
> The box runs dhcpd, bind, fetchmail (cron), pppd (to adsl modem), smb,
> nfs, xinetd (imapd mostly) and sshd.
Only thing in common with me is nfs. Running X 4.1. glibc 2.1.
> based routing) for my cable modem & adsl modem. Also it has a 310Gb raid
> 0 array on 4 IDE disks.
Could be.
> The hardware on the box is : Asus p2b-ds, 2x p3-600, 1Gb (ECC) ram, 3
My mobo is whatever came from dell, and you also are running 2xP3. My
ram is also ECC but there's only 128MB of it.
> network cards (1x Intel EtherExpressPro, 2x 3c905 tx), Internal adaptect
I have 2 network cards, both EEPRO.
> 29xx u2w scsi, internal intel IDE, 2x Seagate Cheetah (u2w) 18 Gb disks
Yep, I have internal adaptec too. Aic7xxx running ultra 160 at 20MHz
on terminated cable.
Adaptec AIC7xxx driver version: 6.2.1
aic7892: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs
4 WD disks:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: WDIGTL Model: WDE9100 ULTRA2 Rev: 1.21
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 00
Vendor: WDIGTL Model: WDE9100 ULTRA2 Rev: 1.21
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 02 Lun: 00
Vendor: WDIGTL Model: WDE9100 ULTRA2 Rev: 1.21
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 03 Lun: 00
Vendor: WDIGTL Model: WDE9100 ULTRA2 Rev: 1.21
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
> (/ and /var), 4x 80 Gb Maxtor IDE disks (raid 0 array) and a NVidia TNT2
> card. This hardware
Umm .. I think I run ati rage, external card, though there is one on
the mobo.
(--) PCI:*(0:16:0) ATI Mach64 GU rev 154, Mem @ 0xf5000000/24,
0xfe201000/12, I/O @ 0xd400/8
(--) PCI: (1:0:0) ATI Mach64 GW rev 122, Mem @ 0xfc000000/24,
0xfbfff000/12, I/O @ 0xec00/8
> The kernel is compiled with all network- and scsi card and raid0 drivers
> build in, and nfs + iptables as modules. The machine currently uses ext3
I have it all compiled OUT. Including iptables, which I don't use.
> (also build in), however this problem was also present before i
> converted the raid0 volume to ext3, so i do not suspect it to cause this
I am using xfs on top of lvm on top of raid5.
> problem. The kernel is also set for HIGHMEM (4gb) to use the last Mb's
> of the 1Gb of ram (else 127Mb isnt detected).
Mine isn't. Normal setup.
> I do not know which component (iptables / route hack / raid0 / network
> cards / highmem) cause this problem. I run several of these components
Looks from this as though it might be raid5 or 0 + adaptec scsi + SMP.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-25 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-25 14:49 Chris Chabot
2001-11-25 15:03 ` Florian Weimer
2001-11-25 15:41 ` Phil Sorber
2001-11-25 15:53 ` François Cami
2001-11-25 17:17 ` Phil Sorber
2001-11-25 15:10 ` James Morris
2001-11-25 15:19 ` Chris Chabot
2001-11-25 15:27 ` Peter T. Breuer [this message]
2001-11-25 15:39 ` Chris Chabot
2001-11-25 17:03 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-26 20:15 ` Bill Davidsen
2001-11-25 15:30 ` Chris Chabot
2001-11-25 15:51 ` Chris Chabot
2001-11-25 18:44 ` Chris Chabot
2001-11-25 15:55 ` Mr. Shannon Aldinger
2001-11-25 16:14 ` Florian Weimer
2001-11-26 15:11 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-11-26 6:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-11-26 9:50 ` Chris Chabot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200111251527.QAA05393@nbd.it.uc3m.es \
--to=ptb@it.uc3m.es \
--cc=chabotc@reviewboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®