From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:37:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:36:19 -0500 Received: from WARSL401PIP3.highway.telekom.at ([195.3.96.75]:44051 "HELO email04.aon.at") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:35:24 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:35:14 +0100 From: Andreas Krennmair To: marcelo@conectiva.com.br Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] Fix for a few annoying "no license" warnings Message-ID: <20011126193514.A914@aon.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Marcelo, the following patch fixes these annoying "no license" warning from insmod for af_packet.o, msdos.o, vfat.o, inflate_fs.o by adding the MODULE_LICENSE. The patch is against 2.4.16. diff -uNr linux-2.4.16.orig/fs/inflate_fs/inflate_syms.c linux-2.4.16/fs/in= flate_fs/inflate_syms.c --- linux-2.4.16.orig/fs/inflate_fs/inflate_syms.c Thu Oct 25 22:53:53 2001 +++ linux-2.4.16/fs/inflate_fs/inflate_syms.c Mon Nov 26 19:17:33 2001 @@ -19,3 +19,4 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(zlib_fs_inflateReset); EXPORT_SYMBOL(zlib_fs_adler32); EXPORT_SYMBOL(zlib_fs_inflateSyncPoint); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); diff -uNr linux-2.4.16.orig/fs/msdos/msdosfs_syms.c linux-2.4.16/fs/msdos/m= sdosfs_syms.c --- linux-2.4.16.orig/fs/msdos/msdosfs_syms.c Mon Mar 13 21:35:39 2000 +++ linux-2.4.16/fs/msdos/msdosfs_syms.c Mon Nov 26 19:16:32 2001 @@ -40,3 +40,4 @@ =20 module_init(init_msdos_fs) module_exit(exit_msdos_fs) +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); diff -uNr linux-2.4.16.orig/fs/vfat/vfatfs_syms.c linux-2.4.16/fs/vfat/vfat= fs_syms.c --- linux-2.4.16.orig/fs/vfat/vfatfs_syms.c Fri Oct 12 22:48:42 2001 +++ linux-2.4.16/fs/vfat/vfatfs_syms.c Mon Nov 26 19:16:53 2001 @@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ =20 module_init(init_vfat_fs) module_exit(exit_vfat_fs) +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); diff -uNr linux-2.4.16.orig/net/packet/af_packet.c linux-2.4.16/net/packet/= af_packet.c --- linux-2.4.16.orig/net/packet/af_packet.c Wed Oct 31 00:08:12 2001 +++ linux-2.4.16/net/packet/af_packet.c Mon Nov 26 19:15:45 2001 @@ -1902,3 +1902,4 @@ =20 module_init(packet_init); module_exit(packet_exit); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); Regards, Andreas Krennmair --=20 I know I could use the "mem=3D6M" switch to test it out myself, but I keep telling myself that I have a lot of testers who have nothing better to do than make me happy. Right? ("Yes Master"). -- Linus Torvalds --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQEeBAEUAwAGBQI8AotiAAoJECw98mPKmtL6b34EAMRpj+aIYTYyMz+VD2Z8ZrDZ MwAlzj3IWxpTpygwnIyuLtWvs8ezSuQpQS2uV5wo+k+EJklLgg0JkuCHot1EQerd QSAK0JKgI1SKM97ad7PwdnvVsUZ0HbERhg6El2E/Z0wo+MvMPxbTZc1JbcFUT01u kvEvGB2bNig0Er2ey16jA/wOIhcl/ArSpgyteDOlgnOxY730E6LwQ29yA384uRG+ 3EnI0J01C+AXPy516/3pblk6pC/qRCKEBtjgy1zBCeGl7V+kkgUC+xc8w7yCEEpq UlNaHK9R3/2P9ULE6cP2ABmMDVdDgGDnunP7SwaPVZfhQQYAYeub9ruDHxAMVuMp XA== =/M1D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--