From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: per-char IO tests
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:14:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011209151431.2172397E@lyta.coker.com.au> (raw)
I have released a new experimental version of Bonnie++ that includes a
program to test per-char IO using putc()/getc(), putc()/getc() when linked in
a non-threaded way (significantly improves performance)
putc_unlocked()/getc_unlocked(), and write()/read().
Here's the results of testing my Thinkpad T20 with P3-650:
Version 1.93 write read putcNT getcNT putc getc putcU getcU
lyta 142 651 8189 9348 1763 1813 22174 44887
lyta,142,651,8189,9348,1763,1813,22174,44887
Here's the results of testing my Athlon 800 play machine:
Version 1.93 write read putcNT getcNT putc getc putcU getcU
test 146 607 7356 7280 1834 1971 41995 59100
test,146,607,7356,7280,1834,1971,41995,59100
Both machines run ReiserFS. A quick test indicates that using Ext2 instead
of ReiserFS triples the performance of write(fd, buf, 1), but this is
something I already knew (and had mentioned before on the ReiserFS list).
Also based on previous tests I expect Solaris to outperform Linux with glibc
on putcNT, getcNT, putc, and getc. The regular performance of putc() on
Solaris comes close to putc_unlocked() on Linux with glibc.
I'd like to thank Andrew Morton for forwarding messages from L-K that
provoked me to write this new test program.
I was tempted to subscribe to L-K to join this discussion, but it seems that
Linus is saying everything that needs to be said anyway so there's no point.
;)
--
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
next reply other threads:[~2001-12-09 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-09 15:14 Russell Coker [this message]
2001-12-09 15:59 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011209151431.2172397E@lyta.coker.com.au \
--to=russell@coker.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®