Re: O_DIRECT wierd behavior..

[Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>]

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 07:26:05PM +0000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Andrew Morton  <akpm@zip.com.au> wrote:
> >I take that to mean that if an error occurs, we return that
> >error regardless of how much was written.
> 
> I disagree.
> 
> Note that writing 15 characters out of 30 is also a "successful write" -
> it's just a _partial_ write.
> 
> >Which makes sense.  Consider this code:
> >
> >	open(file)
> >	write(100k)
> >	close(fd)
> >
> >if the write gets an IO error halfway through, it looks like
> >the caller never gets to hear about it at present.

	IIRC, SUS states that if a fatal error occurred causing the
partial write, that error will be returned on the next write or upon
close().  Thus:

	/* Smart program handles partial writes */
	write(100k); = 50k
	write(remaining 50k); = -1/ENOSPC|EIO|etc

or:

	/* Dumb program doesn't handle partial write */
	write(100k); = 50k
	close(fd); = -1/EIO
	
Joel

-- 

Life's Little Instruction Book #444

	"Never underestimate the power of a kind word or deed."

			http://www.jlbec.org/
			jlbec@evilplan.org