From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, Mika.Liljeberg@welho.com,
Mika.Liljeberg@nokia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sarolaht@cs.helsinki.fi
Subject: Re: ARM: Re: TCP LAST-ACK state broken in 2.4.17-pre2 [NEW DATA]
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 13:11:55 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011218.131155.91757544.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011218210332.D13126@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <3C1FA558.E889A00D@welho.com> <200112182029.XAA11287@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <20011218210332.D13126@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 21:03:32 +0000
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 11:29:06PM +0300, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> No doubts it still has broken misaligned access.
You're way out of line with that comment.
Not necessarily Russell. You have even told us on several occaisions
that the older ARMs simply cannot fix up unaligned loads/stores in
fact.
Look, we're analyzing a problem and trying to explore every avenue
for possible problems. If this were sparc64 I'd be checking my
unaligned handler for bugs :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-18 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-18 9:33 Mika.Liljeberg
2001-12-18 18:37 ` kuznet
2001-12-18 20:21 ` Mika Liljeberg
2001-12-18 20:29 ` ARM: " kuznet
2001-12-18 20:52 ` Mika Liljeberg
2001-12-18 21:03 ` Russell King
2001-12-18 21:08 ` David S. Miller
2001-12-18 21:11 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2001-12-18 21:14 ` Russell King
2001-12-18 21:15 ` David S. Miller
2001-12-18 21:27 ` Mika Liljeberg
2001-12-18 21:24 ` Rik van Riel
2001-12-18 21:28 ` Russell King
2001-12-18 21:33 ` David S. Miller
2001-12-18 20:28 ` David S. Miller
2001-12-20 7:40 ` David S. Miller
2001-12-20 7:51 ` Stevie O
2001-12-20 8:58 ` Russell King
2001-12-20 7:31 ` Stevie O
2001-12-20 9:01 ` Russell King
2001-12-20 10:22 ` David Weinehall
2002-01-02 19:52 ` Mike Touloumtzis
2001-12-19 9:10 ARM: " Mika.Liljeberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011218.131155.91757544.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=Mika.Liljeberg@nokia.com \
--cc=Mika.Liljeberg@welho.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sarolaht@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome