From: Timothy Covell <timothy.covell@ashavan.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Frame Buffer Device Development
<linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Framebuffer...Why oh Why???
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 15:13:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200112302117.fBULHISr011887@svr3.applink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011227195037.GA229@znex> <3C2D0D13.CB1C5683@zip.com.au> <3C2ED18D.FA550F1A@zip.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <3C2ED18D.FA550F1A@zip.com.au>
On Sunday 30 December 2001 02:34, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > However I don't see why _any_ architecture wants framebuffer contents
> > to be included in core files. It sounds risky.
> >
[snip]
When X11 locks up, I can still kill it and my box lives. When
framebuffers crash, their is no recovery save rebooting. Back in 1995
I thought that linux VTs and X11 implemenation blew Solaris out of the
water, and now we want throw away our progress? I'm still astounded
by the whole "oooh I can see a penquin while I boot-up" thing?
Granted, frame buffers have usage in embedded systems, but do they
really have to be so deeply integrated??
--
timothy.covell@ashavan.org.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-30 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-27 19:50 Framebuffer, mmap(), hanging in D state, root FS unmount failure Mark J Roberts
2001-12-29 0:23 ` Andrew Morton
2001-12-30 8:34 ` [patch] " Andrew Morton
2001-12-30 21:13 ` Timothy Covell [this message]
[not found] ` <3C2F8727.5D4AAE21@zip.com.au>
2001-12-30 22:27 ` [patch] Re: Framebuffer...Why oh Why??? Timothy Covell
2001-12-31 1:51 ` James Simmons
2001-12-31 2:49 ` Andrew Morton
2001-12-31 3:23 ` James Simmons
2001-12-31 12:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-12-31 13:18 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-31 21:53 ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-12-31 0:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-31 1:54 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " James Simmons
2001-12-31 8:03 ` gmack
2001-12-31 9:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-12-31 21:41 ` Rob Landley
2002-01-01 7:00 ` Werner Puschitz
2002-01-01 7:00 ` Timothy Covell
2002-01-01 10:42 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-01 20:36 ` Rob Landley
2002-01-02 11:36 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-01-01 14:31 ` Marius Gedminas
2002-01-03 22:26 ` Marco Ermini
2002-01-04 13:27 ` [OT] " Tommi Kyntola
2002-01-04 14:04 ` Marco Ermini
2001-12-31 21:42 ` Scott McDermott
2001-12-31 21:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-31 22:26 ` James Simmons
2001-12-31 22:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-01-01 2:43 ` Bill Nottingham
2002-01-01 6:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-01-01 18:42 ` Joachim Steiger
2002-01-01 10:21 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-01 0:23 ` Ken Moffat
2002-01-01 7:03 ` Timothy Covell
2001-12-31 12:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-01-07 6:36 Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-01-07 11:11 ` Marco Ermini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200112302117.fBULHISr011887@svr3.applink.net \
--to=timothy.covell@ashavan.org \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®