From: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 15:28:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020101152859.D14915@one-eyed-alien.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2vgexzv90.fsf@ppro.localdomain> <20011223112249.B4493@kroah.com> <m23d1trr4w.fsf@pengo.localdomain> <20011230122756.L1821@suse.de> <20011230212700.B652@one-eyed-alien.net> <20011231125157.D1246@suse.de> <20011231145455.C6465@one-eyed-alien.net> <065e01c192fd$fe066e20$6800000a@brownell.org> <20020101233423.I16092@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20020101233423.I16092@suse.de>; from axboe@suse.de on Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:34:23PM +0100
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2183 bytes --]
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:34:23PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01 2002, David Brownell wrote:
> > Not that I've seen a writeup about highmem (linux/Documentation
> > doesn't seem to have one anyway) but if I infer correctly from that
> > DMA-mapping.txt writeup, URBs don't support it because there's no way
> > to specify buffers as a "struct page *" or an array of "struct
> > scatterlist". That's the only way that document identifies to access
> > "highmem memory".
This sounds like another good reason to have URBs take scatterlists
directly, oddly enough. :)
> > > (1) Do the USB HCDs support highmem? I seem to recall they do, but
> > > I'm not certain.
> >
> > If URBs can't describe highmem, the HCD's won't support them per se;
> > you'd have to turn highmem to "lowmem" or whatever it's called, and
> > then let the HCDs manage the lowmem-to-dma_addr_t mappings.
> >
> > Alternatively, in 2.5 we might add "highmem" support to USB. Now that
> > I've looked at it a few minutes, I suspect we must -- just to support
> > block devices (usb-storage) fully. Is there more to it than adding
>
> No, you can always ask to get pages low mem bounced. Highmem is no
> requirement, and if your device really can't support it there's no point
> in attempting to support it.
I presume there is some overhead in bouncing to lowmem? I imagine that
highmem support for the HCDs wouldn't be that difficult -- they are just
PCI devices, after all.
I'd rather eliminate as much overhead as possible -- I already get
complaints from performance fanatics about the inability of usb-storage to
get past 92% bus saturation (sustained), and the problem will only get
worse on USB 2.0
> > page+offset as an alternative way to describe the transfer_buffer?
>
> no
Hrm... isn't that what one of the patches sent did? Or does that only work
for lowmem allocations described by the structure?
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
Umm, these aren't the droids you're looking for.
-- Bill Gates
User Friendly, 11/14/1998
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-01 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-23 17:44 Peter Osterlund
2001-12-23 19:22 ` Greg KH
2001-12-30 9:31 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-12-30 11:27 ` Jens Axboe
2001-12-31 5:27 ` Matthew Dharm
2001-12-31 11:51 ` Jens Axboe
2001-12-31 22:54 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Matthew Dharm
2001-12-31 23:59 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-01-01 17:39 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-01 17:40 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-01 19:53 ` David Brownell
2002-01-01 22:34 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-01 23:28 ` Matthew Dharm [this message]
2002-01-02 5:40 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: highmem and usb [was: "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1] David Brownell
2002-01-02 9:27 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: highmem and usb [was:"sr: unalignedtransfer" " Oliver.Neukum
2002-01-02 18:43 ` David Brownell
2002-01-02 9:31 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: highmem and usb [was: "sr: unaligned transfer" " Jens Axboe
2002-01-02 9:30 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1 Jens Axboe
2002-01-02 5:27 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: highmem and usb [was "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1] David Brownell
2002-01-02 9:32 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-02 18:37 ` David Brownell
2002-01-02 18:44 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-02 18:55 ` David Brownell
2002-01-02 20:23 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-02 22:32 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: highmem and usb [was "sr: unalignedtransfer" " Oliver.Neukum
2001-12-24 4:05 ` "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1 Bob_Tracy
2001-12-24 7:24 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-12-24 14:13 ` WHICH MACHINE????? Astinus
2001-12-24 15:37 ` Erik Mouw
2001-12-25 15:41 ` Svein Ove Aas
2001-12-26 13:56 ` Erik Mouw
2001-12-24 16:19 ` J.A. Magallon
2001-12-24 22:48 ` "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1 Peter Osterlund
2001-12-27 7:13 ` Petr Titera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020101152859.D14915@one-eyed-alien.net \
--to=mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®