From: Christoph Dworzak <linuxkernel@amazing.ch>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tulip@scyld.com
Subject: 2.4.17 tulip multiport-patch
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 02:04:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020115020413.B11753@amazing.ch> (raw)
Hi
After lots of Headscratching, I found this little bug:
replace line 1642 of tulip_core.c:
irq = last_irq;
with
dev->irq = irq = last_irq;
It's a hack for Multiport-NICs where only the first one contains
an EEPROM (I have a Adaptec ANA-6944A/TX). It puts other ports
on the same irq as the first one, but it forgot to actually set
it in the dev-structure...
With this correction my Firewall works like a champ now (before
it crashed immediately when activating the second port of the
multiport-nic).
While searching for this Bug, I also tried the de4x5-driver.
It worked, but with troubles. It sets the MAC-Address of all
the other ports to the MAC of the first port + 1. ALL of them
to the same MAC!
I tried to find out why, but I didn't find this in the code
(I found where it adds this 1, but didn't see why it doesn't
increase it further for further ports...)
Don't know if this is related:
While using the de4x5-driver, my system-load climbed steadily
up. After 3 Days it was at 99.5%.
Top didn't show any processes using this time, but the Computer
was reaaaaaly slow (pressing a key took several seconds until
it appeared on the console...)
This was repeatable. -> Reboot every other day :(
If this happens again, how do I find out what's using the CPU?
(I tried top, vmstat, free, but nothing unusual showed up beside
the system-% in top).
bye
dworz
Config (two Computers A and B):
A Amd-k6/300, 64MB
B Dual PIII-600, 512MB
both with ANA-6944A/TX + 2 other tulips
both RH7.2 with all updates as of 1.1.02
kernel 2.4.9-13 (the tulip-bug is still in 2.4.18pre3)
Computer B would not slow down with DE4x5, but maybe it wasn't
running long enough yet...
Both crashed with tulip.
next reply other threads:[~2002-01-15 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-15 1:04 Christoph Dworzak [this message]
2002-01-15 2:03 ` [tulip] " Donald Becker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020115020413.B11753@amazing.ch \
--to=linuxkernel@amazing.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tulip@scyld.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®