From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:04:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:03:57 -0500 Received: from khan.acc.umu.se ([130.239.18.139]:27095 "EHLO khan.acc.umu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:02:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:02:48 +0100 From: David Weinehall To: Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , Linux-Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [patch] getting rid of suser/fsuser for good, first part Message-ID: <20020117180248.Q5235@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <20020117091203.N5235@khan.acc.umu.se> <20020117122704.E22171@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <20020117122704.E22171@suse.de>; from davej@suse.de on Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 12:27:04PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 12:27:04PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:12:03AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote: > > It is after all 2.5-time, and hence time for a spring-cleaning. > > These files are still naughty (feel free to fix!): > > > > arch/i386/kernel/mtrr.c > > This file in particular needs more than just a spring clean imo. > As extra support was added for the different MTRR lookalikes, > it got messier and messier until it turned into the goop we > have now. Doing a real cleanup on this has been on my TODO for > months now. Hopefully I'll get around to it in the 2.5 timeframe. Agreed. I had a look in it, and it looked like a horrible mess. /David _ _ // David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander \\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/