From: Rainer krienke <rainer@krienke.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.17:Increase number of anonymous filesystems beyond 256?
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:33:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200201201033.g0KAXfw20121@robotnik.krienke.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.1011275640.16596.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com> <200201181212.g0ICCGq14563@bliss.uni-koblenz.de> <a29tms$s9v$1@cesium.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <a29tms$s9v$1@cesium.transmeta.com>
Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2002 20:40 schrieb H. Peter Anvin:
> Followup to: <200201181212.g0ICCGq14563@bliss.uni-koblenz.de>
> By author: Rainer Krienke <krienke@uni-koblenz.de>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> > Now think of a setup where no user directory mounts are configured but
> > the whole directory of a NFS server with many users is exported. Of
> > course this makes things easyer for the NFS-system since only one mount
> > is needed but on the client you need to create link trees or something
> > similar so the user still can access his home under /home/<user> and not
> > something like /home/server1/<user>. Moreover even if you create link
> > trees when you issue commands like pwd you see the real path (eg
> > /server1/<user>) instead of the logical (/home/<user>). Such paths are
> > soon written into scripts etc, so that if the user is moved sometime
> > later things will be broken.
> > You simply loose a layer of abstraction if you do not mount the users dir
> > directly. The only other solution I know of would be amd. Amd
> > automatically places a link. But since we come from the sun world, we
> > simply uses suns automounter and there were no problems up to now.
>
> This can easily be resolved with vfsbinds. Even Sun has a specific
> syntax in their automounter to deal with this
> (server:common_root:tail). If I ever do another autofs v3 release I
> will probably try to incorporate that via vfsbinds.
>
> -hpa
You mentioned, you'd probably include this in another V3 release. Does this
mean, that V4 already can do this? What syntax is needed? What about the
logical/physical path problem? Is this already solved by using vfsbinds in V4?
Thanks Rainer
--
Rainer Krienke, rainer@krienke.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-20 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1011275640.16596.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-01-17 18:55 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-01-18 12:12 ` Rainer Krienke
2002-01-18 19:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-20 10:33 ` Rainer krienke [this message]
2002-01-20 10:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-18 20:33 ` Horst von Brand
2002-01-19 22:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-21 22:54 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-01-18 12:26 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-01-21 12:40 ` Rainer Krienke
2002-01-22 10:25 ` Rainer Krienke
2002-01-22 10:40 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-01-22 13:08 ` Rainer Krienke
2002-01-22 13:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-01-22 15:23 ` Rainer Krienke
2002-01-22 17:45 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-01-24 8:58 ` Rainer Krienke
2002-01-24 17:16 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-01-25 7:28 ` Rainer Krienke
2002-01-25 17:41 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-01-25 18:34 ` Richard Gooch
2002-01-25 18:42 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-01-24 17:29 ` Richard Gooch
2002-01-22 15:40 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-01-22 19:45 ` Pete Zaitcev
[not found] <200201171351.g0HDpdK05456@bliss.uni-koblenz.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-01-17 17:49 ` Andi Kleen
2002-01-17 13:51 Rainer Krienke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200201201033.g0KAXfw20121@robotnik.krienke.org \
--to=rainer@krienke.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®