From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:47:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:47:46 -0500 Received: from [65.188.226.101] ([65.188.226.101]:63496 "HELO fancypants.trellisinc.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:47:34 -0500 From: dank@trellisinc.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: When will CLONE_THREAD be available in a thread package? In-Reply-To: <3C4C9122.384C675C@mvista.com> User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.19ext3 (i686)) Message-Id: <20020122234717.D63BDA3EA2@fancypants.trellisinc.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:47:17 -0500 (EST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <3C4C9122.384C675C@mvista.com> you wrote: > A bit off topic, but.... > CLONE_THREAD has been in the kernel for a bit, but is their a threads > package for user land that uses it? If not when? look at ibm's next-generation posix threading: http://oss.software.ibm.com/pthreads/ i've been keeping up patches (most recent: 2.4.16) at: http://gtf.org/~dank/ngpt/ -- nicholas black (dank@trellisinc.com) "c has types for a reason. c++ improved the type system for a reason. perl and php programs have run-time failures for a reason." - lkml