From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:37:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:37:41 -0500 Received: from web11201.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.131.171]:36439 "HELO web11201.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:37:36 -0500 Message-ID: <20020123223734.44281.qmail@web11201.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:37:34 -0800 (PST) From: gravsten Subject: cannot disable INET from (arm-)linux-2.4.17 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, I was advised to re-post this to your mailing list, instead of linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk - hopefully this is the right place. I just completed a build of 2.4.17 patched for ARM (SA11x0), and ran across this problem: if I disable TCP/IP (INET), some stuff in Networking (NET) fails. This comes from the reference in net/core/rtnetlink.c to tcp.h, which calls ecn_tcp.h, and further addresses 'af_inet' in the sock structure, although it is not defined. As a result, I had to get INET back into my .config , which of course is an annoyance. Does any of you have experienced this already? Is there a fix? Besides, I would very much like your comments on running the SA11x0 with or without MMU. What other patch(es) are you using on this platform? Please respond to me personally (in Cc: at least), as I am not (yet) registered to this mailing list. Thanks, Guilhem. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/