From: Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj@urpla.net>
To: Daniel Nofftz <nofftz@castor.uni-trier.de>,
Ed Sweetman <ed.sweetman@wmich.edu>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] amd athlon cooling on kt266/266a chipset
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:35:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020124123548.91B4F65F@shrek.lisa.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0201241046130.6560-100000@infcip10.uni-trier.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0201241046130.6560-100000@infcip10.uni-trier.de>
On Thursday, 24. January 2002 10:47, Daniel Nofftz wrote:
> On 23 Jan 2002, Ed Sweetman wrote:
> > 1-2 degrees is within the sensor's deviation. Either you dont have it
> > working correctly or it doesn't work at all in your case.
> >
> > You also need acpi idle calls, not just apm. now this is just my guess
> > but apm idle calls might either mess things up or be disabled if acpi
> > idle calls are used and disconnecting the cpu... either way you can't
> > have this patch work and apm work at the same time.
>
> or the vlc makes enough load on the mashine that there is no realy power
> saving ...
No, vlc creates between 15% and 25% load, when using XVideo output without
scaling: (source are plain unencrypted vob files on the server).
1 0 1 0 51688 16 620376 0 0 0 0 1232 1068 25 1 74
2 0 0 0 50792 16 621272 0 0 0 0 1091 985 22 2 76
0 0 0 0 49772 16 622296 0 0 0 0 1246 1124 21 2 77
0 0 0 0 48620 16 623448 0 0 0 0 1346 1129 24 2 74
3 0 0 0 47720 16 624344 0 0 0 0 1086 960 14 5 81
1 0 0 0 46696 16 625368 0 0 0 0 1227 1096 23 3 74
0 0 0 0 45932 16 626136 0 0 0 0 970 913 19 1 80
0 0 0 0 44908 16 627160 0 0 0 0 1242 1061 21 1 78
2 0 0 0 43756 16 628312 0 0 0 0 1339 1052 18 5 77
1 0 0 0 42852 16 629208 0 0 0 0 1108 1006 18 0 82
0 0 0 0 41828 16 630232 0 0 0 0 1229 1112 17 0 83
3 0 0 0 40676 16 631384 0 0 0 0 1358 1111 18 4 78
0 0 0 0 39524 16 632536 0 0 0 0 1359 1114 17 3 80
0 0 0 0 38628 16 633432 0 0 0 0 1170 1070 14 1 85
4 0 0 0 37600 16 634456 0 0 0 0 1217 1005 18 1 81
0 0 0 0 36836 16 635224 0 0 0 0 1003 997 18 1 81
1 0 0 0 35812 16 636248 0 0 0 0 1241 1035 17 3 80
1 0 1 0 34788 16 637272 0 0 0 0 1232 1020 15 2 83
2 0 1 0 33888 16 638168 0 0 0 0 1092 963 16 2 82
3 0 0 0 32872 16 639192 0 0 0 0 1239 1097 20 2 78
0 0 0 0 31840 16 640216 0 0 0 0 1249 1136 13 4 83
4 0 0 0 30688 16 641368 0 0 0 0 1329 1043 17 4 79
0 0 0 0 29664 16 642392 0 0 0 0 2273 2045 18 9 73
0 0 0 0 28640 16 643416 0 0 0 0 1218 1045 16 2 82
2 0 0 0 27904 16 644184 0 0 0 0 1085 1400 22 1 77
1 0 0 0 27256 16 644824 0 0 0 0 1106 1386 24 3 73
0 0 0 0 26360 16 645720 0 0 0 0 1320 1391 24 2 74
Fullscreen mode (scaling) takes approx. 5% more.
1 0 0 0 4440 16 668124 0 0 0 0 1494 2580 26 2 72
1 0 0 0 4372 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1307 1465 27 2 71
1 0 0 0 4364 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1284 2991 38 1 61
0 0 0 0 4404 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1114 1482 30 2 68
2 0 0 0 4416 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1111 1031 24 1 75
1 0 0 0 4432 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1210 1076 21 2 77
0 0 0 0 4444 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1260 1195 20 3 77
2 0 0 0 4448 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1240 1101 27 1 72
0 0 0 0 4456 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1367 1171 26 1 73
0 0 0 0 4448 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1388 1182 24 2 74
3 0 0 0 4448 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1236 1065 24 2 75
0 0 0 0 4444 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1372 1199 26 1 73
0 0 0 0 4444 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1373 1194 27 0 73
3 0 0 0 4444 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1364 1101 24 2 75
0 0 0 0 4444 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1246 1103 26 2 72
0 0 0 0 4448 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1348 1077 24 2 74
2 0 0 0 4448 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1374 1239 25 3 73
0 0 0 0 4400 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1881 1697 25 4 71
0 0 0 0 4412 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1113 1004 26 0 74
2 0 0 0 4444 16 667996 0 0 0 0 1388 2767 38 3 59
1 0 0 0 4392 16 668124 0 0 0 0 1425 1418 27 3 70
0 0 0 0 4476 16 668252 0 0 0 0 1603 1725 25 4 71
1 0 0 0 4376 16 668380 0 0 0 0 1491 1427 27 3 70
You can see, enough idleness...
The question is, why amd_disconnect=true causes this distortion. I tend to
believe that dis-/reconnecting CPU takes simply too long in this scenario.
> daniel
>
>
> # Daniel Nofftz
> # Sysadmin CIP-Pool Informatik
> # University of Trier(Germany), Room V 103
> # Mail: daniel@nofftz.de
Cheers,
Hans-Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-24 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-22 17:15 Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-22 18:51 ` Lee Packham
2002-01-22 19:03 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-23 20:16 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2002-01-23 20:49 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-23 21:16 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2002-01-24 9:49 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-24 12:40 ` Rasmus Bøg Hansen
2002-01-24 20:57 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-24 21:14 ` Rasmus Bøg Hansen
2002-01-24 21:52 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-23 20:29 ` Ed Sweetman
2002-01-23 20:54 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2002-01-23 21:04 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-23 22:25 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2002-01-24 9:54 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-24 9:47 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-24 12:35 ` Hans-Peter Jansen [this message]
2002-01-24 20:54 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-24 21:16 ` Disconnect
2002-01-24 21:55 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-24 22:16 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2002-01-30 8:58 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-22 22:01 Dieter Nützel
2002-01-22 22:21 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-22 22:42 ` Dieter Nützel
2002-01-24 5:14 ` Timothy Covell
2002-01-23 7:27 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-23 11:55 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-01-23 13:19 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-23 15:47 ` Ed Sweetman
2002-01-23 19:18 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-24 18:14 ` Timothy Covell
2002-01-23 19:24 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-23 20:22 ` Dieter Nützel
2002-01-24 9:55 ` Pavel Machek
2002-01-24 21:50 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-23 20:18 ` Dieter Nützel
[not found] ` <200201232018.g0NKI9Q06525@dydimus.dreamhost.com>
[not found] ` <200201232248.g0NMmqL01292@home.ashavan.org.>
2002-01-23 23:20 ` Dieter Nützel
[not found] <200201222243.XAA14711@rzmail.uni-trier.de>
2002-01-23 7:42 ` Daniel Nofftz
[not found] <000701c1a42c$8c6f8680$0201a8c0@HOMER>
2002-01-23 19:21 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-23 20:36 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2002-01-23 20:38 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-23 20:50 ` Joel Jaeggli
2002-01-24 2:33 ` Dieter Nützel
[not found] ` <E16TZhr-00049f-00@mxng04.kundenserver.de>
2002-01-24 12:59 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2002-01-24 14:23 ` Ed Sweetman
2002-01-25 12:23 ` Matthew Sackman
2002-01-24 14:39 ` Martin Eriksson
2002-01-24 21:06 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-24 23:18 ` Dieter Nützel
2002-01-24 23:27 ` Dieter Nützel
2002-01-25 14:17 ` Liakakis Kostas
2002-01-25 15:31 ` Ed Sweetman
2002-01-25 16:10 ` Liakakis Kostas
2002-01-25 17:19 ` Dave Jones
[not found] <200201232023.VAA07669@rzmail.uni-trier.de>
2002-01-23 20:55 ` Daniel Nofftz
[not found] <200201232321.AAA02845@rzmail.uni-trier.de>
2002-01-24 10:32 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-24 15:58 Dieter Nützel
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201241223260.28872-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2002-01-24 18:25 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2002-01-24 21:33 ` Daniel Nofftz
2002-01-25 8:54 Thomas Tonino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020124123548.91B4F65F@shrek.lisa.de \
--to=hpj@urpla.net \
--cc=ed.sweetman@wmich.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nofftz@castor.uni-trier.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®