From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:45:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:44:55 -0500 Received: from pc1-camc5-0-cust78.cam.cable.ntl.com ([80.4.0.78]:4550 "EHLO amadeus.home.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:44:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 20:43:39 +0000 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Tim Pepper Cc: Alexander Sandler , "Linux Kernel Mailing List (E-mail)" Subject: Re: 2.4.17: Bug? Message-ID: <20020204204339.GA3217@fenrus.demon.nl> In-Reply-To: <20020204104525.A30033@vato.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020204104525.A30033@vato.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 10:45:25AM -0800, Tim Pepper wrote: > On Mon 04 Feb at 11:12:27 +0200 ASandler@store-age.com done said: > > No no no no. > > > > This is a bug. For me, it took two hours to get released > > from that. There is no such thing two hours timeout. > > And who said this is only two hours? I spoke with Arjan van de Ven > > and he told me that it may take for up to 14 hours. > > > > Anyway, Arjan told me that he fixed this bug in the version that > > will be out with 2.4.18. Misunderstanding; I did not say (or intend to say) that it will go into 2.4.18; it's not good enough yet.