From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 07:43:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 07:43:23 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:46093 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 07:43:15 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:43:12 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux Kernel Development , Linux Serial Development Subject: Re: CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI and early_serial_setup Message-ID: <20020208134311.D32413@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux Kernel Development , Linux Serial Development In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from geert@linux-m68k.org on Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:25:07PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:25:07PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > If CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI=y, but CONFIG_SERIAL=m, the kernel (2.4.18-pre9) doesn't > link because early_serial_setup() is not found. > > I think the correct fix is to not allow CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI, unless > CONFIG_SERIAL=y. Isn't CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI an ia64 only option ? -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs